EU Financial Regulatory Q&A Database

Official Q&As published by EBA, ESMA, EIOPA and the ESA Joint Committee. Non-binding but treated as authoritative guidance by national competent authorities across the EU.

Final — published answer Archive — superseded (EBA only) Pending — awaiting answer Rejected — out of scope or duplicate
Clear all filters

7,216 Q&As matching current filters · page 111 of 145

What is meant by unconditional protection of the capital (e.g. Point 24 of Annex II)?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Are we right to assume that the bootstrapping of equity baskets should also be based on a principal component decomposition (at least for baskets of more than two underlyings)? On which rule should th

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

The principal component analysis of Annex II, Point 23 ensures the consistent simulation of curves. Is it mandatory to use this method also for PRIIPs that depend on only one interest rate underlying,

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

For products with an automatic early-redemption feature, the holding periods might differ for each of the simulations. What value of T, related to the formula for the calculation of the MRM, the lengt

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Does the formula in Annex II Point 17 use the simulated value of the PRIIP divided by its initial value? Should the calculation of VEV post-issuance be based on the ratio of the simulated value divide

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

The MRM class determination for Category 3 PRIIPs, as specified in Annex II, Point 16, states that the “[…] VaR shall be the value of the PRIIP at the 97.5% confidence level […]”. Since the formula in

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Can a PRIIP manufacturer supplement the information described in Annex IV, point 30, of the Commission Delegated Regulation for the pay-off graph to ensure that it is comprehensible and meaningful for

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

According to Point 21 of the Annex VI of the Commission Delegated Regulation for PRIIPs that have been operating less than 3 years transaction costs may be calculated as an average of the actual trans

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

- Guidance on the methodology described in Point 21(c)(ii) to estimate transaction costs: 3. What could be the ‘comparable information’ mentioned in Point 21 (c) (ii) of the Annex VI of the Commission

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Can non-ETDs use the same treatment as ETDs?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

What could be the ‘reference indexes’ mentioned in Point 21(c)(i) of the Annex VI of the Commission Delegated Regulation?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Could you provide an example of the ‘dividends served by the shares held in the portfolio of the funds, shall the dividends not accrue to the fund’ mentioned in Point 5 (r) of Annex VI?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

If the recommended holding period (RHP) of the PRIIP is less than one year, how should performance and cost figures be presented in the KID? Point 45 of Annex IV and point 76a of Annex VI of the Deleg

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

For new funds with performance fees, is it possible to refer to an appropriate benchmark for estimating the relevant returns of a peer group as foreseen in Point 24(b)(ii) second subparagraph of Annex

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Could you provide an example of the provisioned fees for specific treatment of gain and losses, which are referred to in Point 5 (d) of Annex VI?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Is the provision in Annex II, Part 1, Point 14 (b) applicable where a fund has sufficient history?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

In the case of private Equity, infrastructure and other similar funds where the investments to be made by those funds are unknown at the date of creation/investment in the fund, how to anticipate cost

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Could you specify which types of costs of capital guarantee provided by a third party guarantor are those mentioned in Point 5 (i) of Annex VI?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

While financing costs related to borrowing (provided by related parties)” are recognised as a recurring cost in Point 5(h) of Annex VI, could you confirm that overdraft charges on a bank account opera

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

[Question deleted] (Revised 21 December 2022) 9. [Question deleted] (Revised 21 December 2022) 10. How should I calculate the transaction costs associated with an IPO or other offering of primary sec

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Some fees are paid from the fund/investors to the manager based on the narrowing of the share price to NAV discount on a closed-ended listed fund. Should this type of fee be classed as a performance f

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Is a look-through only required for underlying investments above a certain threshold within the portfolio of the fund of fund? When dealing with fund of fund or other multi-layer instruments, does the

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Using the ‘reference indexes’ mentioned in the question above, how should the ‘average bid-ask spreads’ mentioned in Point 21(c)(i) of the Annex VI of the Commission Delegated Regulation be estimated?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

How should the requirement to use data of an appropriate benchmark/proxy be interpreted where there is no, or insufficient, price data for the PRIIP or the underlying value. For example: - Would an op

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

How would the benefits from securities lending (compared to the costs as mentioned in Point 5 (b) (v) of Annex VI) be presented in the KID?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

In Annex II, Part 1, Points 9 and 10 it states that the minimum observation frequency is monthly but subsequently it is specified that in the event of bi-monthly publication of prices the frequency wi

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

For PRIIPs that allow for investment in underlying instruments of a different nature, which are classified in different groups for risk calculation, how should the Summary Risk Indicator (SRI) be calc

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Does Point 53 of Annex VI apply inter alia to insurance-based investment products (unit-linked products as well as non-unit-linked products) in which the capital provided by investors is invested in U

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

What is the meaning of the term “underlying investments” in Annex II, Part 1, Points 4-6 for a PRIIP that is an Undertaking for Collective Investment (UCI)? In particular, do we need to look at the po

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

It appears that unit-linked insurance products without guarantees would fall into Category 2.

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Are PRIIPs with unconditional capital protection categorised as Category 2 or Category 3?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Clarification is necessary on the specific currency risks which will be covered by Element C of Annex III of the Commission Delegated Regulation. Clarification is necessary for PRIIPs distributed simu

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Will it be possible for the manufacturer to include certain products, such as leveraged products, voluntarily in “Category 1” for the purposes of the market risk assessment?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

The main difference between Category 2 and Category 3 is whether the condition of “constant multiple” is fulfilled in Annex II, Part 1, Point 5. Would it be correct to treat unit-linked insurance prod

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Would a hedge fund that meets the following criteria be considered a Category 1 or Category 3 PRIIP?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Independence of management boards and supervisory functions - Group links, independence and cooling-off periods

Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities Directive (UCITS) Directive 2009/65/EC

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-01

Speculative immovable property financing

Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) · Art. 4, 128

EBA Final Q&A

Answered 2017-06-30

Use of bona fide estimates for the determination of the size of a corporation

Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) · Art. 153, 162

EBA Final Q&A

Answered 2017-06-30

Systemic risk buffer requirement calculation

Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD) · Art. 133

EBA Final Q&A

Answered 2017-06-30

Contingent liabilities within the Merchant Services Industry

Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) · Art. 99

EBA Final Q&A

Answered 2017-06-30

Short positions in financial institution capital instruments

Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) · Art. 36, 45

EBA Final Q&A

Answered 2017-06-30

Written Credit Derivatives Add-On MR/NR Netting

Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) · Art. 429d

EBA Final Q&A

Answered 2017-06-30

CVA Standardised Method for Securities Financing Transactions (SFTs)

Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) · Art. 384

EBA Final Q&A

Answered 2017-06-30

Private ownership of a bridge institution or an asset management tool

Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) · Art. 40, 42

EBA Final Q&A

Answered 2017-06-23

O-SII buffer / Capital conservation buffer application

Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD) · Art. 131, 141a

EBA Final Q&A

Answered 2017-06-16

Calculation of the Countercyclical Capital Buffer

Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD) · Art. 140

EBA Final Q&A

Answered 2017-06-16

Reporting of assets lending on an unsecured basis

Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) · Art. 425

EBA Final Q&A

Answered 2017-06-16

Information on cost and charges

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Investor Protection and Intermediaries

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-06-06

Information on cost and charges

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Investor Protection and Intermediaries

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-06-06

Information on cost and charges

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Investor Protection and Intermediaries

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-06-06

Source: EBA Single Rulebook Q&A, ESMA Q&A, EIOPA Q&A, ESA Joint Q&As. Updated weekly. Q&As are non-binding guidance.

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.