ESA Joint Committee · priips-129 Final

According to Point 21 of the Annex VI of the Commission Delegated Regulation for PRIIPs that have been operating less than 3 years transaction costs may be calculated as an average of the actual trans

Regulation
PRIIPs
Answered
2017-07-04
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
⚠

Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.

Question

According to Point 21 of the Annex VI of the Commission Delegated Regulation for PRIIPs that have been operating less than 3 years transaction costs may be calculated as an average of the actual transaction costs incurred during the period of operation and a standardised estimate. When and how should the costs be calculated? Using the example of a new product and where the KID is revised annually: At the occasion of the first annual review the product manufacturer can use data about the actual transaction costs for the first six months of the PRIIPs existence and for the remaining 30 months (to give an average over 3 years), would use the estimate of portfolio turnover in each asset class according to the methodology referred to in Point 21(c). Accordingly, at the second annual review the product manufacturer may use 18 months of actual data and for the remaining 18 months the standardised estimate. (Answer provided by the ESAs on the application of the PRIIPs Delegated Regulation, revised on 21 December 2022) 3. Transaction costs are based on the average of the previous three years, but some managers have not been collecting these in the detail required (with the "arrival price") by Annex VI. How to calculate transaction costs in this case?

Answer

In this case, Point 15 of Annex VI may apply: "When calculating transaction costs using data prior to 31 December 2017, intra-day prices may be considered as not available" (therefore it is permissible to use as the arrival price the opening price of the investment on the day of the transaction or, where the opening price is not available, the previous closing price"). Notwithstanding this, firms should consider whether using opening prices or previous closing prices will lead to a result that is contrary to the overall requirement to be accurate, fair, clear and not misleading. For example, where a PRIIP frequently buys and sells the same instrument on an intra-day basis, using the opening or previous closing price will not be accurate, since this would be the same for both the purchase and sale. In this instance, the firm should seek accurate intra-day arrival prices.

This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.