The main difference between Category 2 and Category 3 is whether the condition of “constant multiple” is fulfilled in Annex II, Part 1, Point 5. Would it be correct to treat unit-linked insurance prod
- Regulation
- PRIIPs
- Answered
- 2017-07-04
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Answer
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
It appears that unit-linked insurance products without guarantees would fall into Category 2.
Answered 2017-07-04
Packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs)
Answered 2025-12-02
The main difference between Category 2 and Category 3 is, in accordance with Annex II Part 1 Point 5, whether the condition of "constant multiple" is fulfilled. In the event where a UCITs product has:
Answered 2025-12-05
Could you confirm if products with recurring premiums are to be modelled as Category 2 PRIIPs or Category 3 PRIIPs?
Answered 2023-12-05
Are PRIIPs with unconditional capital protection categorised as Category 2 or Category 3?
Answered 2017-07-04
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.