EU Financial Regulatory Q&A Database

Official Q&As published by EBA, ESMA, EIOPA and the ESA Joint Committee. Non-binding but treated as authoritative guidance by national competent authorities across the EU.

Final — published answer Archive — superseded (EBA only) Pending — awaiting answer Rejected — out of scope or duplicate
Clear all filters

7,216 Q&As matching current filters · page 110 of 145

Field 30 - Quantity

Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) Regulation (EU) No 600/2014- MDP

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Position reporting

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Systematic internaliser

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Transaction reporting

Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) Regulation (EU) No 600/2014- MDP

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Position reporting

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Position reporting

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Reference Data for financial instruments

Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) Regulation (EU) No 600/2014- MDP

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Record-keeping obligations of HFT firms - non-algorithmic trading desks

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Under which circumstances a trading venue may cancel, vary or correct a transaction?

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Order Record Keeping

Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) Regulation (EU) No 600/2014- MDP

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Unauthorised person as an investment firm meeting the requirements of Article 53(3) of MiFID II being a member or participant of a regulated market or an MTF

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

NFE application of a trading venue for position limit exemption

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Positions held by an investment firm on behalf of their clients

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Transparent and non-discriminatory rules

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Position reporting

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

CCP - novation trade acceptance model

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Position reporting

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Direct Electronic Access (DEA) and algorithmic trading

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Kill functionality

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Trading venues - maximum bid-ask ranges for all instruments traded on venues or only for instruments with market making scheme

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Trading venues

Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) Regulation (EU) No 600/2014- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Order to Trade Ratio (OTR)

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Direct Electronic Access (DEA) and algorithmic trading

Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) Regulation (EU) No 600/2014- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Transaction reporting

Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) Regulation (EU) No 600/2014- MDP

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Trading venues - OTRs

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Closely associated persons under Article 3(1)(26)(d) of MAR

Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 - Market Intergrity

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-06

Transitional provisions applicable to EU index providers already providing a benchmark on 30 June 2016 (ESMA70-145-114_Q&A 9.1)

Benchmarks Regulation (BMR) - Regulation 2016/1011

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-05

Transitional provisions applicable to EU index providers starting to provide a benchmark between 1 July 2016 and 31 December 2017 (ESMA70-145-114_Q&A 9.2)

Benchmarks Regulation (BMR) - Regulation 2016/1011

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-05

What is meant by unconditional protection of the capital (e.g. Point 24 of Annex II)?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Does Point 53 of Annex VI apply inter alia to insurance-based investment products (unit-linked products as well as non-unit-linked products) in which the capital provided by investors is invested in U

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

For PRIIPs that allow for investment in underlying instruments of a different nature, which are classified in different groups for risk calculation, how should the Summary Risk Indicator (SRI) be calc

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

In Annex II, Part 1, Points 9 and 10 it states that the minimum observation frequency is monthly but subsequently it is specified that in the event of bi-monthly publication of prices the frequency wi

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

If the order is a limit order, should the arrival price be the limit order?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

[Question deleted] (Revised 21 December 2022) 9. [Question deleted] (Revised 21 December 2022) 10. How should I calculate the transaction costs associated with an IPO or other offering of primary sec

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

While financing costs related to borrowing (provided by related parties)” are recognised as a recurring cost in Point 5(h) of Annex VI, could you confirm that overdraft charges on a bank account opera

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Could you specify which types of costs of capital guarantee provided by a third party guarantor are those mentioned in Point 5 (i) of Annex VI?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Is the provision in Annex II, Part 1, Point 14 (b) applicable where a fund has sufficient history?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

The MRM class determination for Category 3 PRIIPs, as specified in Annex II, Point 16, states that the “[…] VaR shall be the value of the PRIIP at the 97.5% confidence level […]”. Since the formula in

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Does the formula in Annex II Point 17 use the simulated value of the PRIIP divided by its initial value? Should the calculation of VEV post-issuance be based on the ratio of the simulated value divide

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

For products with an automatic early-redemption feature, the holding periods might differ for each of the simulations. What value of T, related to the formula for the calculation of the MRM, the lengt

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

The principal component analysis of Annex II, Point 23 ensures the consistent simulation of curves. Is it mandatory to use this method also for PRIIPs that depend on only one interest rate underlying,

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Are we right to assume that the bootstrapping of equity baskets should also be based on a principal component decomposition (at least for baskets of more than two underlyings)? On which rule should th

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

A fully protected product can be allocated to MRM 1. Is this still the case if the underlying assets do not have the required minimum historical data, or is the product automatically allocated to MRM

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

In which situations does the credit risk of the underlyings of a PRIIP need to be assessed? In particular, a) what approach should be taken for stocks and UCITS investing in stocks? And b) If a positi

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

For a PRIIP with an MRM of 6, the aggregate SRI will always be 6. Therefore, is it still necessary to assess the credit risk for a PRIIP with an MRM of 6?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Where the investor has access to a compensation scheme for the investment amount of the KID, is it correct to assume that credit risk is zero? It is not correct to assume that there is no credit risk.

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

In case a PRIIP is a fund of funds, where the underlying investment is a fund which is in turn investing in another fund, should we consider the funds in which the PRIIP is investing in directly as th

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

How should derivatives be weighted when applying Point 40 of Annex II?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Please clarify the requirement in Point 38 of Annex II, part II: where a credit assessment is not available under both (a) and (b), i.e. there is not both a credit assessment assigned to the PRIIP and

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Is it fair to assume that a EU-regulated UCITS fund will always meet the requirements under Annex II Point 46 (a) and (b) and thus the CRM for a UCITS fund will always be equal to 1. If not under what

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Source: EBA Single Rulebook Q&A, ESMA Q&A, EIOPA Q&A, ESA Joint Q&As. Updated weekly. Q&As are non-binding guidance.

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.