Where the investor has access to a compensation scheme for the investment amount of the KID, is it correct to assume that credit risk is zero? It is not correct to assume that there is no credit risk.
- Regulation
- PRIIPs
- Answered
- 2017-07-04
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Answer
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
In which situations does the credit risk of the underlyings of a PRIIP need to be assessed? In particular, a) what approach should be taken for stocks and UCITS investing in stocks? And b) If a positi
Answered 2017-07-04
For PRIIPs that allow for investment in underlying instruments of a different nature, which are classified in different groups for risk calculation, how should the Summary Risk Indicator (SRI) be calc
Answered 2017-07-04
For a PRIIP with an MRM of 6, the aggregate SRI will always be 6. Therefore, is it still necessary to assess the credit risk for a PRIIP with an MRM of 6?
Answered 2017-07-04
Is it fair to assume that a EU-regulated UCITS fund will always meet the requirements under Annex II Point 46 (a) and (b) and thus the CRM for a UCITS fund will always be equal to 1. If not under what
Answered 2017-07-04
Key information document (KID)
Answered 2025-10-10
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.