ESA Joint Committee · priips-58 Final

Please clarify the requirement in Point 38 of Annex II, part II: where a credit assessment is not available under both (a) and (b), i.e. there is not both a credit assessment assigned to the PRIIP and

Regulation
PRIIPs
Answered
2017-07-04
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
⚠

Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.

Question

Please clarify the requirement in Point 38 of Annex II, part II: where a credit assessment is not available under both (a) and (b), i.e. there is not both a credit assessment assigned to the PRIIP and a credit assessment assigned to a relevant obligor, but one is available solely under (a) or solely under (b), is it possible to use either of these (depending on which of the two is available)?

Answer

A default credit assessment as set out in Point 43 of Annex II is to be applied in the absence of a credit assessment assigned to the PRIIP, the relevant obligor, or both. The measures under Points 46 to 49 may also apply. In general, where a credit assessment has been assigned at the level of the PRIIP this should take precedence as to a credit assessment at the level of relevant obligors in relation to the PRIIP. Where there are multiple obligors for which a credit assessment is necessary, and a credit assessment is not available for certain of these, the default credit assessment according to Point 43 shall be applied for each of these obligors for which a credit assessment is not available.

This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.