EBA · 2025_7521 Rejected question

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_17.01

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
v23510_h
Topic
Supervisory reporting - Other
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2025-07-10
Browse ECB SSM Register → More Q&As on this regulation →

Question

The formulae v23510_h seems not relevant

Background

As indicated in Annex II, what we should report in r0960 of C_17.01 is Sum of the five highest gross losses for each type of loss event across all business lines. Consequently, it does not justify a systematic totalisation by business line of the sum of the five highest losses.
No answer published yet.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2025_7521

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

Annex XV Validation rule v0559m does not match the Taxonomy 2.0.1 validation being excuted

Answered 2014-09-26

922

Answered 2019-09-20

2.7 - Incorrect rules v0985_m and v0986_m

Answered 2018-10-05

Incorrect validation rule v4456_m

Answered 2019-09-06

More Q&As on this topic

Large Exposures Reporting of Volatility Haircut applied to Exposure Value

Answered 2019-10-04

Pillar III templates aligned with the new supervisory reporting package, DPM 2.7

Answered 2019-04-12

Validation rules v5434_m to v5447_m in DPM 2.7.0

Answered 2019-04-12

Scope of uniform reporting requirements, Integrated Reporting Framework

Answered 2016-02-26

Missing activity in NACE code - for agiculure

Answered 2014-10-03

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

Start free trial → Learn more

14-day free trial. No credit card required.