EIOPA · 922

922

Regulation
(EU) No 2015/2450 - templates for the submission of information to the supervisory authorities
Article
35
Submitted
2016-12-06
Answered
2019-09-20
Browse EIOPA Insurance Register → More Q&As on this regulation →

Question

In the annoted template for the taxonomy 2.1.0, the cell R0230.C0050 of the template S.23.01.01 has been updated in order to accept data (it wasn't possible to fill this cell before). But the validation rule BV79 hasn't been updated to take this in account. The formula is still: {r0290}={r0050}+{r0090}+{r0110}+{r0140}+{r0160}+{r0180} Unlike the other validation rule on the line r0290 (such as BV78 with : {r0290}={r0010}+{r0030}+{r0040}+{r0050}+{r0090}+{r0110}+{r0140}+{r0180}-{r0230}. So I would have expected something more like: {r0290}={r0050}+{r0090}+{r0110}+{r0140}+{r0160}+{r0180}-{R0230} So I would like to know if this is normal or not?

Answer

You are right. Validation should be: {r0290}={r0050}+{r0090}+{r0110}+{r0140}+{r0160}+{r0180}-{R0230}. It will be amended.
View original on European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority ↗

This Q&A is published by European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

Annex XV Validation rule v0559m does not match the Taxonomy 2.0.1 validation being excuted

Answered 2014-09-26

Validations

Answered 2014-08-22

Reporting Templates, Validations

Answered 2023-07-25

946

Answered 2019-09-23

2.7 - Incorrect rules v0985_m and v0986_m

Answered 2018-10-05

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

Start free trial → Learn more

14-day free trial. No credit card required.