EBA · 2025_7467 Rejected question

Taxonmy 3.5 - Inconsistant Validation rules

Regulation
Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
Article
45i
Topic
BRRD Reporting
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2025-05-26

Question

Relating to daisy chain deduction on M 03.00 report, 3 validations rules are inconsistent together (v10839_s, v22357_s and v22545_m)

Background

v10839_s – warning : M 03.00 (r0620 ; c0010) >=0 v22357_s – warning : M 03.00 (r0293 ; c0010/0020) <=0 v22545_m – error : if {r0630} > 0.07 then {r0620 ; c0010} = {r0293 ; c0010} Only true if r0620 = r0293 = 0, which is not the case in case relating to daisy chain deduction and liquidation entities. In order to avoid an “error” with v22545, we chose to implement r0620 as a negative amount and have a warning for v10839_s for several subsidiaries within the Group.
No answer published yet.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2025_7467

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.