EBA · 2026_7683 Final Q&A

Template Z08.01: Validation rules contradict ITS requirements

Regulation
Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
Article
11, para. 1
Topic
BRRD Reporting
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2026-01-15
Answered
2026-04-03
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)

Question

Do validation rules v6446_m and v6447_m for template Z 08.01 (Relevant services) correctly apply in all reporting situations, given that they enforce the condition {c0030} ≠ {c0050} (Service Recipient must differ from Service Provider)? Should these rules be amended or removed to correctly reflect cases of intra‑entity services, where both fields may legitimately contain the same entity name according to the IT Annex II: Instructions of EBA/ITS/2025/04?

Background

During the review of the EBA validation rules for the Resolution Reporting framework, it was identified that the validation rules v6446_m and v6447_m applicable to template Z 08.01 appear inconsistent with the reporting logic defined in the IT Annex. Template Z 08.01 requires institutions to report relevant intra‑entity-, intra‑group-, and external services. The IT Annex explicitly states that, for intra‑entity services, the Service Recipient (column 0030) and the Service Provider (column 0050) may legitimately be identical. However: v6446_m enforces {c0030} ≠ {c0050} with severity = Error → This prevents submission of valid intra‑entity services and makes instruction‑compliant reporting impossible. v6447_m enforces the same condition {c0030} ≠ {c0050}, with severity = Warning → While not submission‑blocking, it still incorrectly flags valid intra‑entity service reporting as problematic. Both rules contradict the IT Annex, which clearly permits that c0030 and c0050 may be equal in intra‑entity cases. Consequently, these validation rules do not accurately capture the reporting logic intended for template Z 08.01 and lead to erroneous validation outcomes. Additionally, since v6446_m is classified as an Error, the rule is submission‑blocking. As a result, reports containing correct intra‑entity service data cannot be submitted while the rule remains unchanged. Given the upcoming submission deadline of 30 April 2026, a clarification or correction of the rule is urgently required to ensure timely and instruction‑compliant reporting.

Answer

It is confirmed that, in accordance with the instructions set out in Annex II of EBA/ITS/2025/04, for intra-entity services the Service Recipient (column 0030) and the Service Provider (column 0050) may legitimately be the same entity.​  Accordingly, the severity of validation rule v6446_m will be amended from “error” to “warning”. This adjustment ensures that cases referring to intra-entity services can be appropriately identified, while still allowing the underlying pre-condition to be monitored.​  As regards validation rule v6447_m, its current treatment will be maintained at this stage in order to continue verifying the relevant pre-condition. However, the rule may be further refined in future reporting cycles to enable a more automated and precise assessment of that pre-condition.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2026_7683

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.