EBA · 2024_7058 Final Q&A

Level of application of permissions for consolidated netting

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
325b, para. 1
Topic
Market risk
Submitted by
Competent authority
Submitted
2024-04-18
Answered
2024-06-21
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)

Question

How should the term 'consolidated basis' be read in Article 325b CRR? Should permissions in accordance with that article be granted only to the highest EU consolidating entity or is it possible to grant these permissions also to several EU sub-consolidating entities? If it is possible to apply this requirement also on a sub-consolidated basis, should the offsetting of the positions only refer to undertakings included in such an entity’s sub-consolidated group?

Background

Article 325b of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) introduces the possibility to offset positions among different institutions or undertakings for the purpose of calculating net positions and own funds requirements on a consolidated basis, subject to a permission of the competent authority. It is unclear what should be considered by 'consolidated basis'. Article 4(1), point (8), CRR explains that this means on the basis of the consolidated situation. Article 4(1), point (7), CRR further explains that consolidated situation means prudential consolidation as if that institution formed, together with one or more other entities, a single institution. However, it is unclear, whether this consolidated basis refers only to a 'EU parent institution' (Article 4(1), point (29), CRR) or also includes a 'parent institution in a Member State' (Article 4(1), point (28), CRR) or a 'parent undertaking (Article 4(1), point (15), CRR). If this offsetting of the positions is allowed also at the level of a 'parent institution in a Member State' or a 'parent undertaking', such offsetting may be performed only for institutions belonging to that particular sub-consolidated group. It is not possible to include in such offsetting institutions belonging to the same group that are not consolidated into this sub-group (such as positions of the overall EU parent entity or positions of other institutions belonging to other EU entities that are not consolidated within this sub-group).

Answer

In accordance with Article 4(1), point (47) and (48), of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR), compliance with the requirements of the CRR on a consolidated basis can refer to any of the levels at which compliance with the CRR's requirements of a group of entities is required in accordance with Part One, Title II, Chapter 2, of the CRR, including the compliance of the group at the level of the EU parent institution (Article 11(1) CRR), the compliance of the group at the level of a parent institution in a Member State (Article 11(1) CRR), the compliance of the group on a sub-consolidated basis (where applicable, e.g. Articles 11(6) or 22 CRR). Consequently, competent authorities can grant permissions in accordance with Article 325b CRR for the purposes of the compliance with the requirements of Part Three, Title IV, of the CRR, at any of these levels. The permission to offset positions granted for a certain (sub)group at a certain level enables only the offsetting of positions between the (specified) entities forming part of that (sub)group. Example 1 X is the ultimate parent of the group P, subsidiary of X, parent in Member State 1, requests the permission for its compliance with the own funds requirements for market risk P has three subsidiaries A, B, C. The permission granted in accordance with Article 325b CRR covers all entities included in that P's scope of consolidation. In example 1, offsetting would be allowed between P, A, B and C, but not between them and entity X. The scope of a permission granted in accordance with Article 325b CRR does not have to match the scope of consolidation at which it was granted, i.e. a permission can be granted for subsets of entities, instead of all entities, included in that scope of consolidation. Example 2 X is the ultimate parent of the group P, subsidiary of X, parent in Member State 1, requests the permission for its compliance with the own funds requirements for market risk P has three subsidiaries A, B, C. The permission granted in accordance with Article 325b CRR covers A, B, and C, but excludes P. In example 2, offsetting would be allowed between A, B and C, but not permitted between A/B/C and an entity X, between A/B/C and an entity P, between X and P.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2024_7058

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.