EBA · 2018_3653 Final Q&A

Reporting C67 - "Concentration of funding by counterparty ", why the product coding has not evolved compared to the new EBA text ?

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
99, para. 5
Topic
Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
Submitted by
Consultancy firm
Submitted
2018-01-02
Answered
2018-04-06
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Browse ECB SSM Register → More Q&As on this regulation →

Question

As part of the implementation of the new ITS on reporting on the ‘Additional Monitoring Tools’ to put into production by the end of March 2018, we found that in the specifications of new taxonomies for reporting C 67.00 – ‘Concentration of funding by counterparty’, the product coding has not evolved. The new EBA text mentions the renaming of the ‘REPO’ product category to ‘SFT’ and the addition of two new categories: ‘OSWF - Other secured wholesale funding’ and ‘OFP - Other funding products’. Why is the taxonomy not aligned with the new EBA text?

Background

Template C 67.00 – ‘Concentration of funding by counterparty’, the product coding has not evolved compared to the new EBA text.

Answer

The DPM for version 2.7 of the reporting framework is not aligned with the instructions on column 050 (product type) of template C 67.00 (Concentration of funding by counterparty) of Annexes XVIII (template) and XIX (instructions) to Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (ITS on Supervisory Reporting) as amended by Regulation (EU) 2017/2114. Therefore, the reporting of the product type in column 050 should, where possible, follow the codes based on the previous DPM version and the code reported shall be the code which corresponds best to the product codes provided by the new instructions; otherwise the product type shall be left empty. More specifically, -       the new product codes ‘SFT’ and ‘OSWF’ should be reported as ‘REPO’, -       while in those cases where ‘OFP’ would be the most suitable product type as defined by the revised instructions, column 050 shall be left blank. The amendment introducing the new product codes will take place in DPM version 2.8.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2018_3653

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

DPM 2.7.0.1 has not been fully aligned with 2017/2114

Answered 2018-04-06

Difference between 'product type' and 'product category' and clarification on product type reporting (Annex XIX, part 1.3, template C 68.00)

Answered 2018-01-12

Template C 67.00 CONCENTRATION OF FUNDING BY COUNTERPARTY: How to report secured funding

Answered 2016-01-08

COREP Additional Liquidity Monitoring Metrics - technical implementation of DPM v4.2 for template C_67.00.a and C_67.00.w - SubCategory "new_CO4" used instead of "new_CO1"

Answered 2026-03-13

Large Exposures : Mismatch between ITS and DPM v3.0 - C28 column 350 / C29 column 360.

Answered 2021-06-25

More Q&As on this topic

COREP Additional Liquidity Monitoring Metrics - technical implementation of DPM v4.2 for template C_67.00.a and C_67.00.w - SubCategory "new_CO4" used instead of "new_CO1"

Answered 2026-03-13

ASF factors for Additional Tier 1 items as wells as Tier 2 items and other capital instruments maturing between 6 month and 1 year

Answered 2025-10-07

Treatment of wholesale term deposits with early withdrawal penalty clauses for maturity ladder purposes

Answered 2025-07-11

Own secured debt issues in Top 10 - C71.00

Answered 2025-02-21

Treatment of deposits pledged as collateral against loans in c66.01

Answered 2025-01-10

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

Start free trial → Learn more

14-day free trial. No credit card required.