Large Exposures : Mismatch between ITS and DPM v3.0 - C28 column 350 / C29 column 360.
- Regulation
- Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
- Article
- 99
- Topic
- Supervisory reporting - Large Exposures
- Submitted by
- Competent authority
- Submitted
- 2021-04-13
- Answered
- 2021-06-25
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Question
Background
Answer
Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2021_5814
This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
C 09.04, row 010, column 010 – Exposure value under the standardised approach for relevant credit exposures
Answered 2017-02-03
DPM 2.7.0.1 has not been fully aligned with 2017/2114
Answered 2018-04-06
DPM 3.0 - C80.00 - C84.00 - Inconsistent modelisation and validation rules v10127_m and v10143_m.
Answered 2021-07-23
AE: F3201, F3202, F3203 - Discrepancy between taxonomy and ITS
Answered 2021-06-04
DPM 400 - Modelisation of report C1000
Answered 2025-03-21
More Q&As on this topic
COREP Large exposure, validation rule v_1678 related to POCI assets
Answered 2023-10-06
Include all entities which belong to a group of connected clients in Large exposure templates
Answered 2021-11-26
Large Exposures Reporting - Reporting of Shadow Banking Positions under EBA Taxonomy 3.0
Answered 2021-08-06
Clarification of Value Adjustments according to Art. 111 of CRR2
Answered 2021-06-25
Reporting of of the group of connected clients in C27 Identification of the counterparty (LE1) when the national reporting system DOES NOT provide a unique code for the group of connected clients
Answered 2021-03-05
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.