EBA · 2021_5819 Final Q&A

Large Exposures Reporting - Reporting of Shadow Banking Positions under EBA Taxonomy 3.0

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
Article 394(2) CRR
Topic
Supervisory reporting - Large Exposures
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2021-04-20
Answered
2021-08-06
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Browse ECB SSM Register → More Q&As on this regulation →

Question

Institutions are required to report information on the 10 largest exposures to institutions on a consolidated basis, and on the 10 largest exposures to shadow banking entities that carry out banking activities outside the regulated framework on a consolidated basis, in accordance with Article 394(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013. The reporting instructions for template C27.00, Column 070 state: The type of the counterparty of the ten largest exposures to institutions and the ten largest exposures to shadow banking entities shall be specified by using “I” for institutions or “S” for shadow banking entities, which carry out banking activities outside the regulated framework. We have reviewed the information in DPM database published on 8-Apr, together with the DPM dictionary and annotated templates published on 18th Mar and note that this states that only 'I' or 'U' can be used in this instance. There is no mention of 'S'. This being the case, please advise how Shadow Banking positions should be classified?

Background

There is no identifier for Shadow Banking positions within the associated Taxonomy 3.0 DPM.

Answer

In column 070 of template C 27.00 of Annex VIII to Regulation (EU) No 2021/451 (ITS on supervisory reporting), institutions shall report the type of the counterparty of the ten largest exposures to institutions and the ten largest exposures to shadow banking entities. The later shall be specified by using “S” for shadow banking entities, which carry out banking activities outside the regulated framework. In the DPM v3.0, the corresponding type of counterparty is “U”. Reporting entities should use U as provided in the DPM to report shadow banking entities until the DPM is fixed. The DPM will be fixed in the next framework release v3.2.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2021_5819

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

Reporting requirement of the “10 largest exposures to institutions” and “10 largest exposures to unregulated financial sector entities”

Answered 2014-04-11

Concentration risk - type of counterparty

Answered 2015-10-30

Report information on the 20 largest exposures to clients or groups of connected clients

Answered 2015-05-08

Reporting aggregate exposure to shadow banking entities in CRR3

Answered 2025-06-13

Principles for completing template C 67.00 and C 71.00

Answered 2016-02-05

More Q&As on this topic

COREP Large exposure, validation rule v_1678 related to POCI assets

Answered 2023-10-06

Include all entities which belong to a group of connected clients in Large exposure templates

Answered 2021-11-26

Clarification of Value Adjustments according to Art. 111 of CRR2

Answered 2021-06-25

Large Exposures : Mismatch between ITS and DPM v3.0 - C28 column 350 / C29 column 360.

Answered 2021-06-25

Reporting of of the group of connected clients in C27 Identification of the counterparty (LE1) when the national reporting system DOES NOT provide a unique code for the group of connected clients

Answered 2021-03-05

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

Start free trial → Learn more

14-day free trial. No credit card required.