EU Financial Regulatory Q&A Database

Official Q&As published by EBA, ESMA, EIOPA and the ESA Joint Committee. Non-binding but treated as authoritative guidance by national competent authorities across the EU.

Final — published answer Archive — superseded (EBA only) Pending — awaiting answer Rejected — out of scope or duplicate
Clear all filters

7,361 Q&As matching current filters · page 110 of 148

Positions held by an investment firm on behalf of their clients

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Trading venues - OTRs

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Kill functionality

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Order to Trade Ratio (OTR)

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Trading venues - maximum bid-ask ranges for all instruments traded on venues or only for instruments with market making scheme

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Under which circumstances a trading venue may cancel, vary or correct a transaction?

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Field 30 - Quantity

Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) Regulation (EU) No 600/2014- MDP

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Reference Data for financial instruments

Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) Regulation (EU) No 600/2014- MDP

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Transparent and non-discriminatory rules

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Direct Electronic Access (DEA) and algorithmic trading

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Position reporting

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

CCP - novation trade acceptance model

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Position reporting

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Record-keeping obligations of HFT firms - non-algorithmic trading desks

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Position reporting

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Position reporting

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Position reporting

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Systematic internaliser

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Direct Electronic Access (DEA) and algorithmic trading

Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) Regulation (EU) No 600/2014- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

NFE application of a trading venue for position limit exemption

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Unauthorised person as an investment firm meeting the requirements of Article 53(3) of MiFID II being a member or participant of a regulated market or an MTF

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) Directive 2014/65/EU- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Order Record Keeping

Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) Regulation (EU) No 600/2014- MDP

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Transaction reporting

Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) Regulation (EU) No 600/2014- MDP

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Transaction reporting

Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) Regulation (EU) No 600/2014- MDP

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Trading venues

Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) Regulation (EU) No 600/2014- Secondary Markets

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-07

Closely associated persons under Article 3(1)(26)(d) of MAR

Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 - Market Intergrity

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-06

Transitional provisions applicable to EU index providers already providing a benchmark on 30 June 2016 (ESMA70-145-114_Q&A 9.1)

Benchmarks Regulation (BMR) - Regulation 2016/1011

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-05

Transitional provisions applicable to EU index providers starting to provide a benchmark between 1 July 2016 and 31 December 2017 (ESMA70-145-114_Q&A 9.2)

Benchmarks Regulation (BMR) - Regulation 2016/1011

ESMA Answer Published

Answered 2017-07-05

In Annex II, Part 1, Points 9 and 10 it states that the minimum observation frequency is monthly but subsequently it is specified that in the event of bi-monthly publication of prices the frequency wi

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Could you provide an example of the ‘dividends served by the shares held in the portfolio of the funds, shall the dividends not accrue to the fund’ mentioned in Point 5 (r) of Annex VI?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

If the recommended holding period (RHP) of the PRIIP is less than one year, how should performance and cost figures be presented in the KID? Point 45 of Annex IV and point 76a of Annex VI of the Deleg

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

The MRM class determination for Category 3 PRIIPs, as specified in Annex II, Point 16, states that the “[…] VaR shall be the value of the PRIIP at the 97.5% confidence level […]”. Since the formula in

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Does the formula in Annex II Point 17 use the simulated value of the PRIIP divided by its initial value? Should the calculation of VEV post-issuance be based on the ratio of the simulated value divide

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

For products with an automatic early-redemption feature, the holding periods might differ for each of the simulations. What value of T, related to the formula for the calculation of the MRM, the lengt

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Point 80 of Annex VI specifies that “the costs are assessed on an ‘all taxes included’ basis. Which types of taxes are referred to in this point?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

At what frequency must the Recurring costs and Incidental costs be calculated?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

While financing costs related to borrowing (provided by related parties)” are recognised as a recurring cost in Point 5(h) of Annex VI, could you confirm that overdraft charges on a bank account opera

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Should entry and exit costs under the table ‘Composition of costs’ of Annex VII be recalculated as an impact per year based on the recommended holding period instead of a RIY figure? No, the calculati

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

The principal component analysis of Annex II, Point 23 ensures the consistent simulation of curves. Is it mandatory to use this method also for PRIIPs that depend on only one interest rate underlying,

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Are portfolio costs for traditional endowment insurances to be taken into account in the summary cost indicator of the KID?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Are we right to assume that the bootstrapping of equity baskets should also be based on a principal component decomposition (at least for baskets of more than two underlyings)? On which rule should th

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

What is meant by unconditional protection of the capital (e.g. Point 24 of Annex II)?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

A fully protected product can be allocated to MRM 1. Is this still the case if the underlying assets do not have the required minimum historical data, or is the product automatically allocated to MRM

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

In which situations does the credit risk of the underlyings of a PRIIP need to be assessed? In particular, a) what approach should be taken for stocks and UCITS investing in stocks? And b) If a positi

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Could you specify which types of costs of capital guarantee provided by a third party guarantor are those mentioned in Point 5 (i) of Annex VI?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

According to the Point 37 of Annex VI ‘If the PRIIP manufacturer is unable to distinguish the relevant implicit costs to be disclosed as referred to in Point 29 of this Annex using the difference betw

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

What value should be input into portfolio transaction costs of PRIPs other than investment funds?

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Is it correct to say that for the purpose of the Points 36 and the following provisions, while the fair value of the product needs to be in line with accounting standards, it does not have to be neces

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

According to Point 33 (b) of Annex VI, the costs of the underlying shall be taken into account in the list of costs of PRIPs other than investment funds. How should this requirement be understood in t

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

How should the requirement to use data of an appropriate benchmark/proxy be interpreted where there is no, or insufficient, price data for the PRIIP or the underlying value. For example: - Would an op

PRIIPs

Joint Committee Final

Answered 2017-07-04

Source: EBA Single Rulebook Q&A, ESMA Q&A, EIOPA Q&A, ESA Joint Q&As. Updated weekly. Q&As are non-binding guidance.

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.