Is it correct to say that for the purpose of the Points 36 and the following provisions, while the fair value of the product needs to be in line with accounting standards, it does not have to be neces
- Regulation
- PRIIPs
- Answered
- 2017-07-04
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Answer
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
Taxonomy 3.2: Is the validation rules v6576_s consistent for fair-value in short position disclosed in the cell C32.03, row 0010, 0020 and 0030, columns 0220 ?
Answered 2024-11-15
Validation rules v5267_m up to v5279_m
Answered 2021-03-19
Valuation of Assets and Liabilities other than TPs
Answered 2023-04-24
Change in Fair Value
Answered 2014-04-04
Calculation of the threshold for using the simplified approach for the determination of AVAs.
Answered 2017-01-20
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.