Should a KID disclose cost information and scenario information about 1 year and half the RHP in case the investors may not be allowed to exit a PRIIP before the end of the RHP?
- Regulation
- PRIIPs
- Answered
- 2024-03-15
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Answer
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
Point 52(h) of Annex VI indicates that transaction costs are included in the ‘other ongoing costs’. What does this mean in terms of where transaction costs should be included in table 2 ‘Composition o
Answered 2022-11-14
What aspects should be considered by the manufacturer when determining the RHP of a PRIIP? In accordance with Article 8(3)(g)(ii) of the Regulation and Articles 2(5) and 6 of the Delegated Regulation,
Answered 2019-04-04
For autocallables, for an early call scenario, what time periods should be used when calculating the performance scenarios and cost figures?
Answered 2022-11-14
[Question deleted] (Revised 21 December 2022) 8. The paragraph which comes directly after the heading “Table 1” (“The person advising on or selling you this product …”) is duplicate in view to Elemen
Answered 2022-11-14
If the recommended holding period (RHP) of the PRIIP is less than one year, how should performance and cost figures be presented in the KID? Point 45 of Annex IV and point 76a of Annex VI of the Deleg
Answered 2017-07-04
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.