For autocallables, for an early call scenario, what time periods should be used when calculating the performance scenarios and cost figures?
- Regulation
- PRIIPs
- Answered
- 2022-11-14
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Answer
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
Point 52(h) of Annex VI indicates that transaction costs are included in the ‘other ongoing costs’. What does this mean in terms of where transaction costs should be included in table 2 ‘Composition o
Answered 2022-11-14
Is it possible to alter the prescribed wording in the KID template for OTC derivatives? It is recognised in point 6a of Annex III and point 12 of Annex V of the Delegated Regulation that some of the s
Answered 2022-11-14
Should a KID disclose cost information and scenario information about 1 year and half the RHP in case the investors may not be allowed to exit a PRIIP before the end of the RHP?
Answered 2024-03-15
Could you clarify for which intermediate holding periods should we show performance scenarios during the lifetime of a product? (E.g.: 1.1 years product, with remaining lifetime of 9 months). We belie
Answered 2022-11-14
[Question deleted] (Revised 21 December 2022) 8. The paragraph which comes directly after the heading “Table 1” (“The person advising on or selling you this product …”) is duplicate in view to Elemen
Answered 2022-11-14
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.