What are the implications of Point 53 of Annex II, Part 3 in terms of the monitoring of data? In particular, is it necessary to calculate the MRM on a daily basis?
- Regulation
- PRIIPs
- Answered
- 2017-08-18
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Answer
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
According to the PRIIPs Delegated Regulation, if the MRM class changes to a different MRM class, the PRIIP manufacturer shall attribute the corresponding MRM class to the MRM class which the PRIIP has
Answered 2025-05-05
What is the relationship between point 11 of Annex IV and Article 15 of the Delegated Regulation?
Answered 2022-11-14
In the case of actively managed funds (meaning there is not a benchmark that can reflect the performance) that have been valued on a weekly basis for more than 10 years (i.e. that currently have only
Answered 2025-12-05
In Annex IV, Case 3 for PRIIPs referred to in point 1 of Annex VIII without sufficient historical data and with no benchmark, or with a benchmark without sufficient historical data, or any other Categ
Answered 2023-12-05
How does Article 15(2)(c) of the Delegated Regulation regarding the review of the KID apply to the different holding periods shown? If the mean return for the PRIIP's moderate performance scenario, ex
Answered 2021-12-17
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.