In the case of actively managed funds (meaning there is not a benchmark that can reflect the performance) that have been valued on a weekly basis for more than 10 years (i.e. that currently have only
- Regulation
- PRIIPs
- Answered
- 2025-12-05
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Answer
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
Packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs)
Answered 2025-12-02
Could you confirm that for what concerns the calculation of performance scenarios, as specified in Annex IV, point 7, the manufacturer must always use monthly data even if the NAV is available at high
Answered 2023-12-05
Regarding the methodologies for performance scenario described in Annex IV of the Delegated Regulation ((EU) 2021/2268) it is not clear what approach should be used to build performance scenarios for
Answered 2022-11-14
In Annex IV, Case 3 for PRIIPs referred to in point 1 of Annex VIII without sufficient historical data and with no benchmark, or with a benchmark without sufficient historical data, or any other Categ
Answered 2023-12-05
How should the requirement to use data of an appropriate benchmark/proxy be interpreted where there is no, or insufficient, price data for the PRIIP or the underlying value. For example: - Would an op
Answered 2017-07-04
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.