Annex II, paragraph 10 of the Delegated Regulation shows sub intervals to use for funds with pricing frequencies of daily, weekly or monthly, but not what to apply for those funds with other pricing f
- Regulation
- PRIIPs
- Answered
- 2021-12-17
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Answer
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
For the identification of additional shorter sub intervals in point 7(b) of Annex IV of the Delegated Regulation, does this mean only the sub intervals that are truncated by the end of the time period
Answered 2022-11-14
In Annex II, Part 1, Points 9 and 10 it states that the minimum observation frequency is monthly but subsequently it is specified that in the event of bi-monthly publication of prices the frequency wi
Answered 2017-07-04
In the case of actively managed funds (meaning there is not a benchmark that can reflect the performance) that have been valued on a weekly basis for more than 10 years (i.e. that currently have only
Answered 2025-12-05
In terms of the identification of sub intervals in point 7(a) of Annex IV of the Delegated Regulation are these all contained within in the time period defined in point 6 of Annex IV?
Answered 2022-11-14
Could you confirm that for what concerns the calculation of performance scenarios, as specified in Annex IV, point 7, the manufacturer must always use monthly data even if the NAV is available at high
Answered 2023-12-05
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.