When performance fees or exit costs are not applicable for a product - does the format of Table 2 Composition of costs allow that the manufacturer to mention ‘n.a.’ instead of ‘0%’ in the table?
- Regulation
- PRIIPs
- Answered
- 2017-08-18
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Answer
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
Annex VII of the Delegated Regulation, Table 2 on composition of costs: Cost elements in the “composition of costs” table are to be presented assuming a 0% annual return which is consistent with the p
Answered 2022-11-14
[Question deleted] (Revised 21 December 2022) 8. The paragraph which comes directly after the heading “Table 1” (“The person advising on or selling you this product …”) is duplicate in view to Elemen
Answered 2022-11-14
Should entry and exit costs under the table ‘Composition of costs’ of Annex VII be recalculated as an impact per year based on the recommended holding period instead of a RIY figure? No, the calculati
Answered 2017-07-04
Point 52(h) of Annex VI indicates that transaction costs are included in the ‘other ongoing costs’. What does this mean in terms of where transaction costs should be included in table 2 ‘Composition o
Answered 2022-11-14
For autocallables, for an early call scenario, what time periods should be used when calculating the performance scenarios and cost figures?
Answered 2022-11-14
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.