EBA · 2026_7862 Rejected question

Incoherent formulae of the validation rule v90317_m

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
v90317_m
Topic
Operational risk
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2026-05-04

Question

The control formula currently in place for column 0070 / row 0340 of template C16.02 does not seem aligned with your definition of this indicator. Could you clarify the expected logic?

Background

Column 0070 / row 0340 of template C_16.02 is defined in Article 314 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1623, which governs the calculation of the fee and commission expense component (FE) The calculation of this column is an annual average, over the last three financial years, of the fees paid by the institution for advice and services, including outsourcing fees paid by the institution in exchange for financial services, but excluding outsourcing fees paid in exchange for non-financial services. The original formula is not compliant : {C_16.02,r0340,c0070,} = sum({C_16.02,r0350,c0030,},{C_16.02,r0350,c0050,},{C_16.02,r0350,c0010,}) - sum({C_16.02,r0360,c0010,},{C_16.02,r0360,c0050,},{C_16.02,r0360,c0030,}) / 3
No answer published yet.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2026_7862

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.