EBA · 2026_7770 Rejected question

Inconsistencies between ITS on resolution planning reporting versus Annotated Table Layout DPM 4.2, RESOL1 and RESOL2

Regulation
Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
Article
11
Topic
BRRD Reporting
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2026-03-13

Question

Could you please align the technical requirements stated in the Annotated Table Layout in the DPM 4.2 module (20260106 Annotated Table Layout RES 4.2 RESOL1RES 4.2.xls) with the requirements as stated in the ITS (Annex II: Instructions) on Z11.00, column 0060 Governing Law (as well in Z12.00 column 0070, Z13.00 column 005, Z14.00 column 0070, Z15.00 column 0100, Z08.01 column 0140, Z08.02 column 0090, Z09.01 column 0130)?

Background

According to the Annex II (II.31), for reporting on Governing Law (column 0060) in Z11.00, the ISO 3166-1alpha-2 code is required. However, in the technical requirements as specified in the Annotated Table Layout, the full country name is requested instead of the ISO code. The same inconsistency is reflected in other Z-templates as well: this relates to Z12.00 column 0070, Z13.00 column 005, Z14.00 column 0070, Z15.00 column 0100, Z08.01 column 0140, Z08.02 column 0090 and Z09.01 column 0130, applicable sections in Annex II are: II.32, II.33, II.34, II.35, II.20.5, II.21, II.26.
No answer published yet.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2026_7770

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.