EBA · 2026_7754 Rejected question

Annex II of Instructions for resolution planning reports vs defined drop downs in DPM model

Regulation
Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
Article
4, para. 11
Topic
BRRD Reporting
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2026-03-11

Question

Annex II specifies that for template Z 09.01, the allowed value for column c0040 should be “Payment systems”, so why is that not included in DPM and what would then be correct system type for e.g. NKS/STEP2/TARGET2?

Background

After reviewing both the EBA XBRL taxonomy 4.2 and the DPM dictionary 4.2, we observed that within the relevant DPM subcategory new_MA5, there is no allowed member corresponding to “Payment systems”. Given the above, we kindly ask you to clarify how these instructions should be implemented in XBRL reporting under the EBA Reporting Framework 4.2. In particular, we would appreciate your guidance on: -whether additional members are expected to be introduced into the taxonomy/DPM, or -whether an alternative reporting approach is foreseen until such alignment is ensured? If "Not applicable" is choosen, when all other neccessary information is filled in for this FMIs, validation rule is triggered (v90347)
No answer published yet.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2026_7754

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.