EBA · 2026_7737 Rejected question

Inconsistency between ITS and Taxonomy

Regulation
Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD)
Article
Annex II, para. Z 06.00
Topic
BRRD Reporting
Submitted by
Other
Submitted
2026-02-27

Question

In the Annex II of the ITS for report Z0600, Column 0030 - DGS , the ITS clearly states that the value other can be reported :"If the officially recognised DGS of which the entity is member is not listed above, ‘oter shall be reported".   But the DPM 4.2 as a restriction fur such column based on subcateogy EN3 which does not allow any "other" value and just nammed the principal DGS to be used. In the previous version of the DPM, the DGS column was technically binded by another enumeration that was allowing an other value : x128 - Other deposit guarantee scheme.   Can you explain us : if it's normal that the DPM 4.2 is now excluding the Other value even if the ITS seems to say that it's a valid option if it's correct for a client for which some CI may used some DGS not listed in the subcateroy EN3, to let this column empty?

Background

Annex II - Z0600 - COlumn 0030 : "If the officially recognised DGS of which the entity is member is not listed above, ‘oter shall be reported". DPM 4.2 Annotated templates & Dictionnary
No answer published yet.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2026_7737

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.