EBA · 2025_7324 Rejected question

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C09.02 v6052_m

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
v6052_m
Topic
Credit risk
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2025-01-31
Browse ECB SSM Register → More Q&As on this regulation →

Question

According to the formulae v6052_m : {r0150} = {r0010} + {r0011} + {r0012} + {r0013} +{r0020} + {r0030} + {r0060} + {r0132} +{r0140} in c0010, c0030, c0040, c0050, c0055, c0060, c0070, c0105, c0110, c0120, c0125, c0130 in C09.02 “CR GB 2”. This control ensures that the sum of exposures declared in line 0150 "Total exposures" is equal to the sum of lines 0010 "Central governments or central banks", 0011 "Of which: Regional governments or local authorities", 0012 "Regional governments or local authorities", 0013 "Public sector entities", 0020 "Institutions", 0030 "Corporates", 0060 "Retail", 0132 "Collective investments undertakings (CIU)" and 00140 "Equity" in CR GB 2. However, the line 0011 is an "of which" of the line 0010 which is also in the formula, this means that it will be doubly taken into account in the totalization. Could you please therefore confirm that the line 0011 should be deleted from the formula?

Background

This control ensures that the sum of exposures declared in line 0150 "Total exposures" is equal to the sum of lines 0010 "Central governments or central banks", 0011 "Of which: Regional governments or local authorities", 0012 "Regional governments or local authorities", 0013 "Public sector entities", 0020 "Institutions", 0030 "Corporates", 0060 "Retail", 0132 "Collective investments undertakings (CIU)" and 00140 "Equity" in CR GB 2. However, the line 0011 is an "of which" of the line 0010 which is also in the formula, this means that it will be doubly taken into account in the totalization.
No answer published yet.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2025_7324

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_47.00, C_43.00.a, C_43.00.b, C_43.00.c - v4456_m

Answered 2026-07-03

Validation rule original exposure pre conversion factors

Answered 2021-03-05

Annex XV Validation rule v0559m does not match the Taxonomy 2.0.1 validation being excuted

Answered 2014-09-26

EBA validation rule (Leverage Ratio) v4456_m

Answered 2017-02-03

Inconsistency in validation rules v4748_m, v4749_m and v4750_m

Answered 2018-04-06

More Q&As on this topic

Application of the currency mismatch treatment to self-employed individuals (natural persons carrying out an economic activity) under Article 123a CRR.

Answered 2026-07-31

Requirements for the purpose of treating exposures secured by mortgages on immovable property as duly secured from an RWA computation perspective under CRR Article 124(2) of the CRR.

Answered 2026-05-08

Use of credit assessments by ECAIs not in scope of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009.

Answered 2026-03-13

US Hard test: adequacy of considering US charge-off rates corresponding to loss rates for exposures secured by residential property or commercial immovable property situated within the territory of the US

Answered 2026-02-27

Application of the SME definition in specific cases

Answered 2025-11-28

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

Start free trial → Learn more

14-day free trial. No credit card required.