EBA · 2017_3623 Final Q&A

Inconsistency in validation rules v4748_m, v4749_m and v4750_m

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
99
Topic
Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
Submitted by
Consultancy firm
Submitted
2017-12-07
Answered
2018-04-06
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Browse ECB SSM Register → More Q&As on this regulation →

Question

In taxonomy 2.7, validation rules v4748_m, v4749_m and v4750_m are introduced for template C 07.00. Validation rule v4748_m expects the ‘fully adjusted exposure value (E*)’ (c150) to be equal to the sum of ‘Breakdown of the fully adjusted exposure value of off-balance sheet items by conversion factors’ (i.e. sum of c160, c170, c180, c190) across rows 010-060, 080 and 140-280 for all sheets Similarly, validation rule v4749_m expects (c150) to be equal to the sum of c160, c170, c180, c190 across rows 290 and 310 for all sheets and validation rule v4750_m expects c150 to be equal to the sum of c160, c170, c180 and c190 across rows 300 and 320 for all sheets. Column 150 includes off balance as well as on balance items and columns 160, 170, 180 and 190 is break down only off balance items by conversion factors. Hence, equality in this validations may not hold true always. So, are these validations correct?

Background

Fully adjusted exposure value of balance items getting included in c150 will not be included brake up by conversion factor in any of c160, c170,c180 and c190. Hence in some cases c150 will be greater than sum of c160, c170,c180 and c190.

Answer

Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (ITS on Supervisory Reporting), Annex II, Part II, states that the fully adjusted exposure value (E*) as reported in column 150 of template C 07.00 of Annex I to the ITS on Supervisory Reporting should be calculated according to Articles 220 (4), Article 223 (2) to (5) and Article 228 (1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR). Additionally, columns 160 to 190 of template C 07.00 are defined as breakdown of the fully adjusted exposure value of off-balance sheet items by conversion factors. Hence, the validation rules v4748_m, v4749_m and v4750_m, for v2.7 defined as {c150} = {c160} + {c170} + {c180} + {c190}, will be fulfilled only for rows which collect the off-balance sheet exposures subject to credit risk. Consequently, these validation rules will be amended, since the fully adjusted exposure value (E*) includes also on-balance items which are not in the scope of columns 160 to 190.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2017_3623

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

Validation rules v4764_m, v4765_m, v4766_m, v4767_m and v4768_m in template C 08.01

Answered 2017-11-17

Inconsistency in validation rule eba_v4721_m

Answered 2019-01-11

Inconsistency in validation rules v0532_m.

Answered 2014-04-04

C 08.01 - validation rule v5739_h (applicable as of v2.7)

Answered 2018-11-09

Finrep. Validation rule v5443_m and others

Answered 2018-10-05

More Q&As on this topic

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_47.00, C_43.00.a, C_43.00.b, C_43.00.c - v4456_m

Answered 2026-07-03

Threshold exemptions from deduction from Common Equity Tier 1 items – Reporting within CoRep C 07.00

Answered 2026-01-09

Calculation of Ideosyncratic and Systematic Risk

Answered 2026-01-09

Appropriate reporting of unconditionally cancellable commitments (UCCs) subject to transitional arrangements of Article 495d in CR SA (COREP C_07.00)

Answered 2025-12-05

C 25.01 - CREDIT VALUATION ADJUSTMENT RISK (CVA) – Col 0090 - Instruction Clarification

Answered 2025-12-05

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

Start free trial → Learn more

14-day free trial. No credit card required.