EBA · 2025_7313 Final Q&A

Part 2 – Template specific instructions to template B_06.01

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 2022/2554 (DORA Reg)
Article
28, para. 9
Topic
Register of information (DORA)
Submitted by
Other
Submitted
2025-01-22
Answered
2025-03-28
More Q&As on this regulation →

Question

Data point B_06.01.0050 is missing from the official ITS templates. Is this data point no longer applicable?

Background

The data model ( Data Model for DORA RoI.pdf ) and the DORA related documents published in the reporting technical package 4.0 ( Reporting framework 4.0 | European Banking Authority ) include data point B_06.01.0050 (Criticality or importance assessment). However, column code B_06.01.0050 is missing from the ITS templates published in the Official Journal, and the column name “Criticality or importance assessment” is associated to column code B_06.01.0060.  It is unclear what column codes should be used.

Answer

Whilst all the relevant data fields are present, there is numbering error in the numbering of the column codes in template-specific instructions to Template B_06.01 in the text published in the EU Official Journal with the value. In particular, B_06.01.0050 missing in the column codes resulting in the data fields being assigned erroneous column codes. The data points included in the reporting technical package v4.0 for the ITS on the Registers of information ( Reporting framework 4.0 | European Banking Authority ) should be considered for the reporting purposes. The data point model contains consecutive numbers of the data fields. The following numbering and the corresponding instructions/ fill-in options should be considered: B_06.01.0050 “Criticality or importance assessment” B_06.01.0060 “Reasons for criticality or importance” B_06.01.0070 “Date of the last assessment of criticality or importance” B_06.01.0080 “Recovery time objective of the function” B_06.01.0090 “Recovery point objective of the function” B_06.01.0100 “Impact of discontinuing the function”

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2025_7313

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

Asset encumbrance templates - Some cells are mapped with the same data point of other ones, but not all of them can be reported on a consolidated basis

Answered 2017-02-03

Inconsistent wording/references between reporting templates and ITS

Answered 2014-03-28

C 09.04, row 010, column 010 – Exposure value under the standardised approach for relevant credit exposures

Answered 2017-02-03

34

Answered 2019-10-25

The additional column C015 “Code” to template C 67.00 contains ambiguity in the Annex IV guidance under the ITS to be implemented at Mar-20: 1.2.8.015 “This code is a row identifier and shall be unique for each row in the template”. It is unclear what identifiers are required in column C015.

Answered 2020-09-11

More Q&As on this topic

ANNUAL REPORT ON NEW ARRANGEMENTS ON THE USE OF ICT SERVICES

Answered 2025-08-14

Obligation to maintain a register of information for FEs exempt under article 16

Answered 2025-08-08

How to fill the refPeriod field of the parameters.csv file for the DORA register of information

Answered 2025-08-08

The scope of the regulation described in Article 6 mismatches what is presented as an option in the Annex I, Part 2 of the same regulation

Answered 2025-07-25

Template specific instructions - field B_01.02.0060 (LEI of the direct parent undertaking of the financial entity)

Answered 2025-03-28

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

Start free trial → Learn more

14-day free trial. No credit card required.