EBA · 2021_5809 Rejected question

Validation rule v6210_m, C105.02

Regulation
Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
Article
154
Topic
Supervisory reporting - Supervisory Benchmarking
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2021-04-09

Question

What rules or regulations raise the upper limits for the ratio of RWA to EAD?

Background

The validation rule v6210_m expects RWA to be max. 12.5 times EAD on a template 105.02. In some exceptional cases high LGD values can cause higher RWA. Also, regulation (neither Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 nor Regulation No 575/2013 (CRR)) does not define any upper limits of the LGD when using own LGD estimates. Annex IV of the benchmarking exercise's ITS defines that depending on the institution’s permission, the LGDs shall be based on the institutions’ own estimates or on regulatory values; in either case, the LGDs shall be those used for the calculation of the RWA. Limiting RWA to be max. 12.5 times EAD for SBP reporting purposes would cause a situation where the figures won’t match with the ones reported in a column 0260 of COREP template 8.1. This validation rule v6210_m is also slightly contradictional with the similar validation rule v8154_m (template C103) which is set to be warning, not blocking error.
No answer published yet.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2021_5809

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.