EBA · 2018_4066 Final Q&A

COREP template C 05.01-validation rule v0269

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
99
Topic
Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2018-06-29
Answered
2019-03-15
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Browse ECB SSM Register → More Q&As on this regulation →

Question

Is it correct that the formula in COREP Table C 05.01, r100,c040 does not take into account the new cell r440,c040 (Adjustments due to IFRS 9 transitional arrangements)?

Background

As from March 2018, a new row (r440) has been added in Table 5.01 of the COREP template in order for the institutions to report separately the adjustments that concern the transitional arrangements of IFRS9. However cell r440,c040 is not taken into account neither in r140,c040 nor in r0100 & r010,c040. As a result the total figure reported in r010,c040 which represents the total adjustments on RWAs is not correct.

Answer

Validation rule v0269 should not be changed, as transitional arrangements for IFRS 9 is not a subcomponent of “deductions”. However, it is true that, contrary to what is done for adjustments to CET1, AT1 and T2 via the validation rules v0255_m, v0256_m and v0264_m, the total of adjustments for RWAs does not take into account row 440: “adjustments due to IFRS9 transitional arrangements” via a validation rule. To be consistent with validation of adjustments to CET1, AT1 and T2 a new validation rule shall be created for RWA (r440) using the following formula : {C05.01; r100; c 040} = {C 05.01; r140; c040} + {C 05.01; r430; c040} + {C 05.01; r440; c 040}

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2018_4066

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

Adjustments due to IFRS 9 transitional arrangements included in RWAs and interaction with validation rule v3689_s in template C5.01.

Answered 2019-07-12

Validation rule on C_05.01 template - v4889_m

Answered 2019-04-12

Validation Rules (SEC) - Rule v531_m does not take into account value adjustments on deductions from own funds

Answered 2014-03-07

Validation Rule v3748_s partly incorrect

Answered 2017-07-28

Validation Rule v3684_s,v3693_s,v3695_s

Answered 2016-04-15

More Q&As on this topic

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_47.00, C_43.00.a, C_43.00.b, C_43.00.c - v4456_m

Answered 2026-07-03

Threshold exemptions from deduction from Common Equity Tier 1 items – Reporting within CoRep C 07.00

Answered 2026-01-09

Calculation of Ideosyncratic and Systematic Risk

Answered 2026-01-09

Appropriate reporting of unconditionally cancellable commitments (UCCs) subject to transitional arrangements of Article 495d in CR SA (COREP C_07.00)

Answered 2025-12-05

C 25.01 - CREDIT VALUATION ADJUSTMENT RISK (CVA) – Col 0090 - Instruction Clarification

Answered 2025-12-05

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

Start free trial → Learn more

14-day free trial. No credit card required.