EBA · 2018_4258 Final Q&A

Validation rule on C_05.01 template - v4889_m

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
99
Topic
Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
Submitted by
Competent authority
Submitted
2018-09-10
Answered
2019-04-12
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Browse ECB SSM Register → More Q&As on this regulation →

Question

Is validation rule v4889_m correct?

Background

For the template C_05.01, this check verifies that “if {c010} != empty then {c060} != empty”, for several rows. In particular, for row 10 this check is triggered when only “Adjustments due to IFRS 9 transitional arrangements” have to be reported among “Adjustments to CET1”. Fixing this check would mean that “Adjustments due to IFRS 9 transitional arrangements” may be included in the “Eligible amount without transitional provisions” (col 60). As laid down in the EU Reg. “EBA-ITS”, amended by EU Reg. 2017/2114, for the template C_05.01 “Adjustments due to IFRS 9 transitional arrangements” are not expected to be reported for template coordinates “col 60, row 440”. Actually the cell is greyed out.

Answer

Row 010 “ Total adjustment ” in template C 05.01 is defined as the sum of row 020 “ Grandfathered instruments ”; row 070 “ Minority interests and equivalents ” and row 100 “Other transitional adjustments”, which already contains the information reported in row 440 “ Adjustments due to IFRS 9 transitional arrangements ”. Since column 060 “ Eligible amount without transitional provisions ” is greyed out respectively for rows 020, 070 and 100, it make sense to also grey out column 060 for row 010. Nevertheless, the amount of each instrument prior the application of transitional provision is reported for each row respectively where the column 060 is available. In this term, validation rule v4889_m will be amended in order to exclude row 010 from its syntax. Moreover, to be coherent with the amended validation rule, the data point r010c060 will be greyed out.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2018_4258

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

Validation rule on C_05.01 template - V0193_M

Answered 2020-05-08

Validation rule v3129_m (FINREP template 18 and 19 IFRS 9)

Answered 2018-10-05

Validation rule v2707_m (FINREP template 18 IFRS 9)

Answered 2018-10-05

COREP template C 05.01-validation rule v0269

Answered 2019-03-15

Validation rule v6063_m in v2.7.0.1

Answered 2019-01-11

More Q&As on this topic

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_47.00, C_43.00.a, C_43.00.b, C_43.00.c - v4456_m

Answered 2026-07-03

Threshold exemptions from deduction from Common Equity Tier 1 items – Reporting within CoRep C 07.00

Answered 2026-01-09

Calculation of Ideosyncratic and Systematic Risk

Answered 2026-01-09

Appropriate reporting of unconditionally cancellable commitments (UCCs) subject to transitional arrangements of Article 495d in CR SA (COREP C_07.00)

Answered 2025-12-05

C 25.01 - CREDIT VALUATION ADJUSTMENT RISK (CVA) – Col 0090 - Instruction Clarification

Answered 2025-12-05

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

Start free trial → Learn more

14-day free trial. No credit card required.