EBA · 2018_4259 Final Q&A

Validation rule on C_17.01 template - v5839_m

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
99
Topic
Supervisory reporting - COREP (incl. IP Losses)
Submitted by
Competent authority
Submitted
2018-09-10
Answered
2019-04-12
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Browse ECB SSM Register → More Q&As on this regulation →

Question

Is validation rule v5839_m correct?

Background

Validattion rule v5839_m could show a possible flaw in its formula: {r0950} >= max({r0050}, {r0150}, {r0250}, {r0550}, {r0450}, {r0550}, {r0650}, {r0750}, {r0850}) It seems to be a duplicated row coordinate for C_17.01 template, namely  {r0550} instead of {r0350}. Thus, we think that the correct formula should be the following one: {r0950} >= max({r0050}, {r0150}, {r0250}, {r0350}, {r0450}, {r0550}, {r0650}, {r0750}, {r0850}). In this case the formula would be coherent with dispositions laid down in the EU Reg. no. 575/2013 (Part no. III, Chapters 3-4) and in the EU Reg. no. 680/2014 (par. 4.2).

Answer

Validation rule v5839_m seeks to control that the maximum single loss reported for the total business lines in row 950 is equal or greater than the maximum single loss reported for the nine business lines respectively reported in rows  {r0050}, {r0150}, {r0250}, {r0350}, {r0450}, {r0550}, {r0650}, {r0750}, {r0850}) of template C 17.01  of Annexe I to Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (ITS on Supervisory Reporting). It is correct, that in the current formula the maximum single loss for Payment and Settlement was counted twice while the business line Commercial Banking is omitted. Therefore, the validation rule has been corrected in the release v2.8.1 of the Reporting framework.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2018_4259

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

Treatment of expected loss amounts in validation rule v4772_m

Answered 2017-12-08

Validation rule v3129_m (FINREP template 18 and 19 IFRS 9)

Answered 2018-10-05

FINREP. Validation rule v5468_m

Answered 2018-11-09

Validation rules v4764_m, v4765_m, v4766_m, v4767_m and v4768_m in template C 08.01

Answered 2017-11-17

Inconsistency in validation rules v4748_m, v4749_m and v4750_m

Answered 2018-04-06

More Q&As on this topic

Validation rules taxonomy V4.0 C_47.00, C_43.00.a, C_43.00.b, C_43.00.c - v4456_m

Answered 2026-07-03

Threshold exemptions from deduction from Common Equity Tier 1 items – Reporting within CoRep C 07.00

Answered 2026-01-09

Calculation of Ideosyncratic and Systematic Risk

Answered 2026-01-09

Appropriate reporting of unconditionally cancellable commitments (UCCs) subject to transitional arrangements of Article 495d in CR SA (COREP C_07.00)

Answered 2025-12-05

C 25.01 - CREDIT VALUATION ADJUSTMENT RISK (CVA) – Col 0090 - Instruction Clarification

Answered 2025-12-05

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

Start free trial → Learn more

14-day free trial. No credit card required.