EBA · 2016_2949 Final Q&A

Review and validation of criteria for the use of a reduced number of parameters

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
105, para. 14
Topic
Market risk
Submitted by
Competent authority
Submitted
2016-10-18
Answered
2017-01-20
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)

Question

For purposes of internal independent review and annual validation of the netting methodology, can the testing be based on historical data from the most recent 100 trading days for the same or similar valuation inputs?

Background

The ratio of variance test is required where AVAs are calculated at the individual parameter level to allow for interrelationship via netting between the parameters. The ratio test does not directly assess the interrelationship in market price uncertainty between parameters, but looks at historical price or spread movements as an appropriate proxy. Assessing based on a similar valuation input would also be a representative proxy, ensuring that interrelationship is still taken into consideration while being considerably less resource intensive.

Answer

Articles 9(4)(b)(c) and 10(5)(b)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2016/101 allow for institutions to perform the independent control function review and internal validation of the netting methodology using historical data from the most recent 100 trading days for the same or similar valuation inputs.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2016_2949

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.