EBA · 2016_2901 Archive

Clarification of 'Facility Type', regarding the characteristic values 'Undrawn committed credit facility' (Annex I) and 'Undrawn committed other credit facility' (Annex II)

Regulation
Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
Article
78, para. 2
Topic
Supervisory reporting - Supervisory Benchmarking
Submitted by
Competent authority
Submitted
2016-09-12
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Browse ECB SSM Register → More Q&As on this regulation →

Question

The segmentation criterion 'Facility Type' is used to define the benchmarking portfolios. In Annex I, Template C 102.00 (Definition of Low Default Portfolios), for some portfolios the facility type is 'Undrawn committed credit facility'. The characteristic value 'Undrawn committed credit facility' is not defined in Annex II. However, in Annex II, Template 102, 'Undrawn committed other credit facility' is a characteristic value for the segmentation criterion 'Facility Type'. 'Undrawn committed other credit facility' is not used in Annex I. Is it correct to assign 'Undrawn committed other credit facility' to 'Undrawn committed credit facility' and if yes, is it correct to only assign 'Undrawn committed other credit facility' to 'Undrawn committed credit facility'?

Background

Inconsistency between Annex I and Annex II concerning segmentation criterion 'Facility Type'.

Answer

The facility type value 'Undrawn committed credit facility' used to define some portfolios in template C 102.00 (Definition of Low Default Portfolios) of Annex I to the Draft ITS on Supervisory Reporting for Institutions for benchmarking the internal approaches (ITS on Supervisory Benchmarking) for the 2017-benchmarking exercise shall be interpreted as the option 'f) Undrawn committed other credit facility' described in the instructions on column 100 of template C 102.00 of Annex II of the ITS on Supervisory Benchmarking. Disclaimer The present Q&A on Supervisory reporting is provisional. It will be reviewed after the Implementing Regulation is in force and published in the Official Journal. The text of the Implementing Regulation may differ from the text of the draft ITS to which this Q&A refers.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2016_2901

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

Definition of undrawn committed credit facilities to report

Answered 2021-03-05

Supervisory Benchmarking Exercise, Annex II, C 102, columns 070 and 080 Counterparty types

Answered 2019-07-26

Definition of low default portfolios for 2017 supervisory benchmarking exercise: Missing Portfolio ID for exposures assigned to both the exposure class ‘institutions’ and to the sector of counterparty ‘general governments’

Answered 2017-03-24

Reporting of (committed) credit and liquidity facilities in the C 66.01 maturity ladder template

Answered 2020-12-04

Clarification of the geographical scope of the benchmark portfolios

Answered 2016-06-24

More Q&As on this topic

Weighted average of the CCF

Answered 2020-11-27

PD-/PD+ for RWA-/RWA+

Answered 2020-11-27

Supervisory Benchmarking Exercise, Annex II, C 102, columns 070 and 080 Counterparty types

Answered 2019-07-26

Supervisory Benchmarking - Alternative risk weight

Answered 2019-07-26

EBA ITS package for 2019 benchmarking exercise (Annex V, section 2, FX instruments)

Answered 2019-07-26

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

Start free trial → Learn more

14-day free trial. No credit card required.