EBA · 2015_2542 Final Q&A

Liquid assets underlying sold call options

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
417, para. e
Topic
Liquidity risk
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2015-12-23
Answered
2017-08-25
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)

Question

Should bonds underlying call options (either American or European expiring within 30 days; with exercise mode physical delivery) written by the institution be considered as used in hedging strategies, thus excluding them from the holding of liquid assets in the context of LCR reporting?

Background

The institution writes call options on bonds (American with exercise mode Physical delivery). Underlying bonds are within the holdings of the institution and they are potentially eligible for being included within the buffer (HQLA) in the context of LCR reporting. It is not clear if the sale of such bond options qualify as hedging strategies as per Article 417(e)(i) of the CRR.

Answer

The use of bonds as a hedge against the potential obligation to deliver these assets due to the sale of a respective bond option is neither a hedging strategy referred to in Article 8(5) of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 nor does it violate the general and operational requirements according to its Articles 7(2), 8(2) and 8(3). Hence, the sale of the bond option has no implications for the eligibility of the underlying assets to the stock of liquid assets. However, the bank must ensure that the potential liquidation of the asset will not conflict with any internal business or risk management strategies. The liquidation of the asset must not lead to a breach of internal limits on open risk positions. According to Article 30(4) of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61, the bank shall take into consideration outflows and inflows expected over 30 calendar days from the contracts listed in Annex II of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013. In the case of sold call options which are exercisable within 30 calendar days an expected outflow should be considered as the positive difference between the market value of the underlying and the strike price of the option, if the option is expected to be cash settled, or as the positive difference between the liquidity value calculated according to Article 9 of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 of the underlying asset and the strike price of the option, if the option is expected to be subject to physical delivery. In case those differences resulted negative (strike price is higher than the liquidity value), no inflow should be considered since it would be contingent and not recognisable in the LCR following Article 32(1) of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2015_2542

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.