EBA · 2020_5148 Final Q&A

Recognition of collateral substitution rights in secured funding transactions

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
416
Topic
Liquidity risk
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2020-03-03
Answered
2022-09-30
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)

Question

Could credit institutions recognise substitution rights on secured funding trades and include any collateral that can be substituted as an unencumbered asset on the reporting date?

Background

Post substitution the collateral is free of any encumbrance. Consider a situation where a firm enters into a secured funding transaction with a counterparty and has pledged HQLA securities on the reporting date but has contractual & legal rights to substitute the HQLA collateral with lesser liquid collateral. During the LCR scenario, any lesser liquid collateral that is unencumbered, due to loss of internalization, can be pledged to the secured funding transaction. Consequently the HQLA securities previously pledged in the secured funding transaction, will now be unencumbered, similar to the rest of the HQLA pool. In the reporting institution’s LCR reporting, if the institution is not recognising an inflow for the transaction, should these newly unencumbered HQLA securities be recognised and contribute to the HQLA securities in template C72 “Liquid Assets.”

Answer

According to requirement of Article 7 of the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 with regard to liquidity coverage requirement (DR LCR), to be classified as a liquid asset, an asset should be unencumbered, i.e. not be subject to any legal, contractual, regulatory or other restriction preventing it from liquidating, selling, transferring, assigning or, generally, disposing of such asset via active outright sale or repurchase agreement. As clarified in Q&A 5475 , according to Annex XVII to Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (ITS on Supervisory Reporting) assets pledged that are subject to any restrictions in withdrawal, such as for instance assets that require prior approval before withdrawal or replacement by other assets, should be considered encumbered. Therefore, as long as the asset is pledged at reporting date it cannot  qualify as a liquid asset. However, collateral substitution results in an “other inflow” or “other outflow” amounting to the difference of the liquid values of the collateral involved as calculated according to Article 9 DR LCR respectively, if the posted collateral has been contractually recalled at reporting date and will be released and available to the institution within the next 30 days. If the posted collateral is not yet called back at reporting date: no inflow can be considered in case the liquid value of the collateral that can be called back is higher than the liquid value of the substitute collateral that would have to be provided, as contingent inflows must not be included in the LCR; the institution should consider the possibility of an outflow according to Article 23 DR LCR if there might be reputational reasons for calling back collateral with a lower liquid value than the liquid value of the substitute collateral that would have to be provided in case of stress.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2020_5148

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.