EBA · 2015_1712 Final Q&A

Reportable maturity for ALMM C70 ROLL-OVER OF FUNDING

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
415, para. 3
Topic
Supervisory reporting - Liquidity (LCR, NSFR, AMM)
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2015-01-07
Answered
2015-12-18
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Browse ECB SSM Register → More Q&As on this regulation →

Question

The ANNEX XXI instructions for the ALMM C70 Roll-overs return do not outline whether initial maturity or remaining maturity should be reported. With regard to the C70 Roll-overs return, should respondents report maturing funding at initial maturity rather than remaining maturity?

Background

In reading the instructions for the ALMM C70 Roll-overs return, we are unsure as to whether the Authority intends respondents to report funding at remaining maturity (and thereby receive a view of the outstanding term profile) or at initial maturity (and thereby receive a view that matches maturing funding term with the corresponding replacement of funding). For example: The respondent bank has an outstanding EUR100m repurchase agreement liability of initial (original) term 95 days (remaining term of only 50 days) which it agrees with the counterparty to roll-over with a 95 day term. Should the repondent report the maturing cashflow and the roll-over cashflow a) at initial term: i.e. both flows in the '>3 Months ≤ 6 Months' time bucket or b) at remaining term: with the maturing cashflow in the '>1 Month ≤ 3 Months' time bucket and the roll-over cashflow in the '>3 Months ≤ 6 Months' time bucket?

Answer

All items in C 70.00 of Annex XX of final draft implementing technical standard (ITS) on additional liquidity monitoring metrics under Article 415(3)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (EBA/ITS/2013/11/rev1 (of 24 July 2014)) should be reported by original maturity in order to reflect how funding is replaced/ rolled over.   DISCLAIMER: The present Q&A on Supervisory reporting is provisional. It will be reviewed after the Implementing Regulation is in force and published in the Official Journal, which may differ from the text of the draft ITS to which this Q&A relates.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2015_1712

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

Reportable maturity for ALMM C69 PRICES FOR VARIOUS LENGTHS OF FUNDING

Answered 2015-12-18

General principle of C70 Roll-over of funding

Answered 2015-12-18

Clarification on the reporting of "maturing" columns in COREP ALMM C 70.00 "Roll-over of funding"

Answered 2020-07-17

Reporting of open ended funding products without a defined maturity

Answered 2015-12-18

Rollover of Funding (C 70.00): Treatment of maturing deposits being renewed at a different tenor

Answered 2017-07-28

More Q&As on this topic

COREP Additional Liquidity Monitoring Metrics - technical implementation of DPM v4.2 for template C_67.00.a and C_67.00.w - SubCategory "new_CO4" used instead of "new_CO1"

Answered 2026-03-13

ASF factors for Additional Tier 1 items as wells as Tier 2 items and other capital instruments maturing between 6 month and 1 year

Answered 2025-10-07

Treatment of wholesale term deposits with early withdrawal penalty clauses for maturity ladder purposes

Answered 2025-07-11

Own secured debt issues in Top 10 - C71.00

Answered 2025-02-21

Treatment of deposits pledged as collateral against loans in c66.01

Answered 2025-01-10

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

Start free trial → Learn more

14-day free trial. No credit card required.