EBA · 2013_607 Final Q&A

Template 5 - Missing Validation Rule

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
99
Topic
Supervisory reporting - FINREP (incl. FB&NPE)
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2013-12-02
Answered
2014-06-27
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)

Question

German Question (Deutsche Frage): Während die nun verbal formulierte Zuordnung der “balances receivable on demand classified as cash balances at central banks“ zu Tabelle 5 (alt 9) in den alten Validation Rules ausdrücklich als Formelbezug angegeben war (F 09.00, r010, c010 = F 01.01, r030, c010), ist diese Verbindung in den aktuellen Validation Rules nicht mehr angegeben. Wie ist dies zu interpretieren? English Question: Whereas the now verbally formulated assignment of the ‘balances receivable on demand classified as cash balances at central banks’ to table 5 (prev. 9) was given expressly as a formula in the old validation rules (F 09.00, r010, c010 = F 01.01, r030, c010), this connection is no longer given in the current validation rules. How should this be interpreted?

Background

Validation Rule Interpretation.

Answer

German Answer (Deutsche Antwort): Der Entfall der Validation Rule die ({F 01.01, r 030, c010} mit {F 05.00, r010, c010} vergleicht war nicht beabsichtigt, da beide Zellen exakt den selben Betrag abfragen.   English Answer: The exclusion of the validation rule that links ({F 01.01, r 030, c010} = {F 05.00, r010, c010} was not intended as both cells ask exactly the same amounts.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2013_607

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.