EBA · 2013_231 Final Q&A

Annex XV Validation formulae, "≡" vs "="

Regulation
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR)
Article
99
Topic
Supervisory reporting - Other
Submitted by
Credit institution
Submitted
2013-09-10
Answered
2014-02-14
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)

Question

We would like to know what the differences are, for the validation formulae purpose, between the symbols "≡" and "=". E.g: Validation {F 20.04 , r140 , c030}≡{F 20.07 , r190 , c020} (without ID). Does this validation mean that the value of both "boxes" o "line items" is the same or, on the contrary, that the "concept" they both refer to is the same? We though it was the first option until we bumped into this question. If it were the second alternative, should it appear in the majority of validation links?

Background

A precise guideline is need in regard to this question.

Answer

The symbol ""61", when comparing two cells, refers to cells that respond to the same concept and thus share the same combination of members in the dimensions used to be defined in the DPM. Consequently, they have to be reported only once. They are added in the Annex XV of the Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 13 ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions (ITS)Draft ITS on Supervisory reporting for information purposes but are not a validation rule themselves (as they are reported only once, the equality will always work). The symbol ""61 " is never used for comparing more than two cells. The symbol "=" is applied to cells that are not defined in the same way in the DPM (they can respond or not to the same concept) but must have the same value. Consequently, they have to be reported separately. They are included in the Annex XV of the Draft ITS for validation purposes.   *As of 1/8/2014 the content of this answer was modified to reflect the publication of the final ITS on supervisory reporting of institutions in the Official Journal of the European Union. As a result, the references to the ITS were updated and the disclaimer deleted. For reasons of transparency, revisions are highlighted in track changes.

Original source: European Banking Authority, Q&A ID 2013_231

This Q&A is published by European Banking Authority and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

More Q&As on this topic

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.