J&E Davy Unlimited Company
1 of 14 sanctions recorded for Ireland.
- Sanction date
- 1 Mar 2021
- Country
- Ireland
- Legal framework
- MiFID
- Nature of sanction
- Administrative sanction and measure
- LEI
- 63540061DPCBNMCGRY22
- ESMA sanction ID
- 12586
Sanction text
Original language: English. Text is published as-is from ESMA.
On 1 March 2021, the Central Bank of Ireland (the Central Bank) reprimanded and fined J&E
Davy (Davy) €4,130,000 in respect of four breaches of the European Communities (Markets in
Financial Instruments) Regulations 2007 (the MiFID Regulations) that occurred over different
intervals between July 2014 and May 2016.
The Central Bank’s investigation arose from a transaction a group of 16 Davy employees (the
Consortium) undertook in a personal capacity with a Davy client (the Client) in November 2014
(the Transaction). Within the Consortium was a group of senior executives (the Committee). In
permitting the Transaction, Davy prioritised facilitating an opportunity for the Consortium to
make a personal financial gain over ensuring that it was complying with its regulatory
obligations. The Transaction highlighted a weak internal control framework within Davy in
relation to conflicts of interest management and personal account dealing. All of this served to
create an elevated risk of investor detriment.
Following details about the Transaction becoming public four months after it occurred, Davy
contacted the Central Bank to provide an explanation. At that stage, Davy failed to disclose the
full extent of the wrongdoing. This lack of candour was treated as an aggravating factor in this
case.
The MiFID Regulations aim to ensure high levels of market transparency and investor
protection and include important regulatory requirements in relation to conflicts of interest and
personal account dealing (where employees of an authorised firm trade for themselves rather
than clients.)
The Central Bank’s investigation found failings in the following areas:
1. Conflicts of interest identification and management: In permitting the Transaction,
Davy breached the MiFID Regulations by failing to take all reasonable steps to identify
whether a conflict of interest arose. At the time of the Transaction, Davy was not
operating in a conflicts of interest aware environment. Whilst Davy did have a conflicts
of interest policy, employees were permitted to decide whether transactions in which
they had an interest could give rise to a conflict of interest on a case-by-case basis,
without independent oversight and without a requirement to keep a record of steps
taken. In deciding at the outset whether the Transaction was permissible, Davy’s
primary focus should have been to identify whether any conflict of interest arose
between the Consortium and the Client. Davy failed to do this properly because the only
cursory discussion of this issue was by senior individuals who intended to participate in
the Transaction and were therefore not impartial. In effect, this amounted to no
consideration of the issue at all by Davy.
2. Personal account dealing framework: Davy did not have a robust control framework in
place to prevent employees from entering into personal transactions that could give rise
to a conflict of interest. The Consortium circumvented the personal account dealing
framework completely, such that Davy's compliance function (Davy Compliance) first
became aware of the Transaction four months later, when certain information about the
Transaction became public.
3. Ensuring the compliance function can discharge its role properly: A compliance
function can only discharge its role effectively when it has access to all relevant
information. Davy permitted the Transaction to proceed without any oversight by Davy
Compliance. Davy Compliance was sidestepped by the Consortium, and as the personal
account dealing framework was circumvented, Davy Compliance did not detect the
Transaction as part of its monitoring.
The Central Bank determined the appropriate fine to be €5,900,000, which was reduced by 30%
to €4,130,000 in accordance with the settlement discount scheme provided for in the Central
Bank’s Administrative Sanctions Procedure.
https://www.centralbank.ie/docs/default-source/news-and-media/legal-notices/settlement-agreements/public-statement-relating-to-settlement-agreement-between-the-central-bank-of-ireland-and-j-e-davy.pdf?sfvrsn=25718e1d_7
Related registers
- MiFID Register NCA-level enforcement actions
- EU Sanctions Commission restrictive measures
- LEI Lookup Look up this entity by LEI
Data sourced from the ESMA sanctions and enforcement register, updated weekly.
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.
Legislation Binding EU law
Proposals Pre-legislative
Guidance Interpretive guidance
Consultations Pre-publication
Case law Binding