EU Financial Regulatory Q&A Database
Official Q&As published by EBA, ESMA, EIOPA and the ESA Joint Committee. Non-binding but treated as authoritative guidance by national competent authorities across the EU.
154 Q&As matching current filters · page 4 of 4
If the recommended holding period (RHP) of the PRIIP is less than one year, how should performance and cost figures be presented in the KID? Point 45 of Annex IV and point 76a of Annex VI of the Deleg
PRIIPs
Answered 2017-07-04
The principal component analysis of Annex II, Point 23 ensures the consistent simulation of curves. Is it mandatory to use this method also for PRIIPs that depend on only one interest rate underlying,
PRIIPs
Answered 2017-07-04
For products with an automatic early-redemption feature, the holding periods might differ for each of the simulations. What value of T, related to the formula for the calculation of the MRM, the lengt
PRIIPs
Answered 2017-07-04
Does the formula in Annex II Point 17 use the simulated value of the PRIIP divided by its initial value? Should the calculation of VEV post-issuance be based on the ratio of the simulated value divide
PRIIPs
Answered 2017-07-04
Source: EBA Single Rulebook Q&A, ESMA Q&A, EIOPA Q&A, ESA Joint Q&As. Updated weekly. Q&As are non-binding guidance.
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.