ESA Joint Committee · sfdr-86 Final

How is it possible to practically apply the requirement to use “equivalent information” as referred to in Article 17(2)(b)?

Regulation
SFDR
Answered
2022-11-17
Answer provided by
ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
⚠

Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.

Question

How is it possible to practically apply the requirement to use “equivalent information” as referred to in Article 17(2)(b)?

Answer

The starting point for the evaluation of equivalent information, as referred to in Article 17(2)(b) of the Delegated Regulation, should be considered information that provides the same content and level of granularity as that provided by the reporting of undertakings of their Taxonomy-aligned activities in Regulation (EU) 2021/2178. In this respect, equivalent information should meet these following basic principles: - Equivalent information should only apply to economic activities listed in the Delegated Acts of Regulation (EC) 2020/852; - The assessment of the substantial contribution of an economic activity should rely on actual information, subject to the limited circumstances described by the European Commission in Question VII.1; and - While it should be possible to use estimates to assess the DNSH based on equivalent information, controversy-based approaches should be discouraged and considered insufficient (as outlined in Q&A 32 below).

This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.

Similar Q&As

📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously

Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.

14-day free trial. No credit card required.