How is it possible to practically apply the requirement to use “equivalent information” as referred to in Article 17(2)(b)?
- Regulation
- SFDR
- Answered
- 2022-11-17
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Answer
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
As of 1 January 2022, financial market participants that make available certain Article 8/9 products shall include information about the proportion of Taxonomy-aligned investments as a percentage of a
Answered 2022-11-17
Annual Contribution of institutions - determination of the risk weight / use of indicators
Answered 2015-07-24
In case a financial product referred to in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 which promotes environmental characteristics does not commit in the pre-contractual disclosures to invest in any econo
Answered 2022-11-17
Are environmental controversies a suitable proxy for “Do No Significant Harm” (DNSH) for the purpose of “equivalent information” referred to in Article 17(2)(b) of the Delegated Regulation?
Answered 2022-11-17
Considering the provisions of the Delegated Regulation, a fund investing in real estate or infrastructure funds would be required to report on its Taxonomy-alignment in the same way than a non-financi
Answered 2022-11-17
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.