For Art. 9 products that are partly taxonomy-aligned, should the disclosures refer to the technical screening criteria as indicators for the taxonomy-aligned part?
- Regulation
- SFDR
- Answered
- 2022-11-17
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Answer
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
An Article 9 SFDR product with 100% non-Taxonomy compliant climate objectives, would still fill the Taxonomy sections with 0% and the social sustainable investment section with 0%? Please refer to the
Answered 2022-11-17
In case a financial product referred to in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 which promotes environmental characteristics does not commit in the pre-contractual disclosures to invest in any econo
Answered 2022-11-17
Once you have reported on your Article 5-6 TR financial product, should your pre- contractual information still be a minimum ambition or the actual achieved level of taxonomy aligned investments?
Answered 2022-11-17
Would it be possible to have a financial product disclosing under Article 8 SFDR that makes sustainable investments with environmental objectives which are not (yet) taxonomy aligned?
Answered 2022-11-17
I am trying to figure out how exactly to calculate the share of sustainable investment that qualify as environmentally sustainable under the EU Taxonomy (SDFR Template, Annex II, first question). Let'
Answered 2024-07-25
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.