How is the envisaged product classification in case of a multi-option product (MOP) that comprises only one investment option that (partially) invests in line with the Taxonomy Regulation? Would the e
- Regulation
- SFDR
- Answered
- 2022-11-17
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Answer
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
An Article 9 SFDR product with 100% non-Taxonomy compliant climate objectives, would still fill the Taxonomy sections with 0% and the social sustainable investment section with 0%? Please refer to the
Answered 2022-11-17
Product disclosures as presented in art. 10 SFDR and art.31 to 57 Delegated Regulation: Can EIOPA provides more clarity on the fact, as it wasn’t specified in the Delegated Regulation, that website di
Answered 2022-11-17
Does the disclosure of the “minimum extent sustainable investments with an environmental objective aligned with the EU Taxonomy” have to be based on actual data or can it consist of a forecast calcula
Answered 2022-11-17
Once you have reported on your Article 5-6 TR financial product, should your pre- contractual information still be a minimum ambition or the actual achieved level of taxonomy aligned investments?
Answered 2022-11-17
In case a financial product referred to in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 which promotes environmental characteristics does not commit in the pre-contractual disclosures to invest in any econo
Answered 2022-11-17
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.