Given the Commission’s interpretative Q&A II.1 notes that sustainable investments can
be measured at economic activity and at the investment level, how can financial
products do this in practice?
The
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit
question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may
occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Given the Commission’s interpretative Q&A II.1 notes that sustainable investments can
be measured at economic activity and at the investment level, how can financial
products do this in practice?
The ESAs have prepared a table below showing how the calculations of sustainable investment
can be done either at the economic activity or the investment level.
This table displays hypothetical financial product examples with illustrative, hypothetical objectives
and investment strategies. The three hypothetical products in the table are a climate product (bond
focus), an SDG Product (bond focus) and a social impact product (equity focus) and their
respective objectives are stated in the subsequent brackets. Companies and economic activities
are likewise hypothetical cases.
Section A displays a hypothetical analysis of the Contribution to Objectives (“C2O”) of an
Economic Activity, where the list of potential contributions aligned with the Article 2(17) SFDR is
non-exhaustive. Section B features DNSH criteria of Economic Activities or Company, where the
hypothetical assessments are limited to “no harm”, “no significant harm”, and “significant harm”.
1%
15%
2%
12%
34.50%
8%
87%
50.50%
90%
OpEx
CapEx
Turnover
0% 50% 100%
1. Taxonomy alignment of investments
including sovereign bonds*
Taxonomy-aligned: Nuclear
Taxonomy-aligned (no gas and nuclear)
Non Taxonomy-aligned
10%
49,50%
13%
1.11%
16.67%
2.22%
13.33%
38.33%
8.89%
85.56%
45.00%
88.89%
OpEx
CapEx
Turnover
0% 50% 100%
2. Taxonomy alignment of investments
excluding sovereign bonds*
Taxonomy-aligned: Nuclear
Taxonomy-aligned (no gas and nuclear)
Non Taxonomy-aligned
11,11%
55%
14,44%
Section C features the assessment of Good Governance characteristics of the Companies, where
the criteria are aligned with Article 2(17) SFDR yet are non-exhaustive. Section D, E and F provide
illustrative, hypothetical financial information, product weights and ring-fencing to contextualise the
examples. Please note that the table is only intended to provide an example of how calculations for
sustainable investment can be made and should not be referred to for any other purpose.
Hypothetical Product
Examples (and Product
Objectives)
Climate Product (bond focus)
(Objectives for Energy, GHG emission and Renewable Energy)
SDG Product (bond focus)
(All 2(17) objectives apply)
Social Impact Product (equity focus)
(Objectives for Tackling inequality, fostering social cohesion and/or integration, and investing in
economically and/or socially disadvantaged communities)
Company
(hypothetical examples)
Company A Company B Company
C
Company D Company
E
Company A Company F Company G
Economic Activity
(hypothetical examples)
Activity
0001
Activity
0002
Activity
0003
Activity
0001
Activity
0004
Activity
0001
Activity
0003
Activity
0004
Activity
0005
Activity
0001
Activity
0002
Activity
0003
Activity
0006
Activity
0007
Activity 0005
Section A: Contribution to Objectives (C2O) of Economic Activities
More Efficient Use of
Energy
insufficient
contribution
sufficient
contribution
no
contribution
insufficient
contribution
no
contribution
insufficient
contribution
no
contribution
no
contribution
sufficient
contribution
objective not selected
Relatively More Use of
Renewable Energy
sufficient
contribution
sufficient
contribution
no
contribution
sufficient
contribution
no
contribution
sufficient
contribution
no
contribution
no
contribution
insufficient
contribution
objective not selected
More Efficient Use of Raw
Materials
objective not selected no
contribution
no
contribution
sufficient
contribution
objective not selected
More Efficient Use of
Water
objective not selected no
contribution
no
contribution
sufficient
contribution
objective not selected
More Efficient Use of
Land
objective not selected no
contribution
no
contribution
sufficient
contribution
objective not selected
Less Production of Waste objective not selected no
contribution
no
contribution
sufficient
contribution
objective not selected
Less Production of
Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
sufficient
contribution
sufficient
contribution
no
contribution
sufficient
contribution
no
contribution
sufficient
contribution
no
contribution
no
contribution
sufficient
contribution
objective not selected
Reducing Impact on
Biodiversity
objective not selected no
contribution
no
contribution
insufficient
contribution
objective not selected
Advancing Impact on
Circular Economy
objective not selected no
contribution
no
contribution
sufficient
contribution
objective not selected
Tackling Inequality objective not selected insufficient
contribution
insufficient
contribution
insufficient
contribution
insufficient
contribution
insufficient
contribution
insufficient
contribution
insufficient
contribution
insufficient
contribution
insufficient contribution
Fostering social cohesion objective not selected no
contribution
no
contribution
insufficient
contribution
sufficient
contribution
sufficient
contribution
no
contribution
insufficient
contribution
sufficient
contribution
insufficient contribution
Fostering social
integration
objective not selected no
contribution
no
contribution
sufficient
contribution
no
contribution
no
contribution
no
contribution
insufficient
contribution
insufficient
contribution
sufficient contribution
Fostering labour relations objective not selected sufficient
contribution
sufficient
contribution
insufficient
contribution
objective not selected
Investing in human capital objective not selected no
contribution
no
contribution
sufficient
contribution
objective not selected
Investing in economically
disadvantaged
communities
objective not selected sufficient
contribution
sufficient
contribution
insufficient
contribution
sufficient
contribution
sufficient
contribution
sufficient
contribution
insufficient
contribution
sufficient
contribution
insufficient contribution
Investing in socially
disadvantaged
communities
objective not selected no
contribution
no
contribution
insufficient
contribution
insufficient
contribution
insufficient
contribution
no
contribution
sufficient
contribution
sufficient
contribution
insufficient contribution
C2O Test outcome pass pass fail pass fail pass pass pass pass pass pass pass pass pass pass
Page 1 of 3 | Notes: This table displays hypothetical financial products with illustrative hypothetical objectives and investment strategies. The three hypothetical products are Climate Product, SDG Product and Social Impact Product and their respective objectives
are stated in the subsequent brackets. Companies and Activities are likewise hypothetical cases. Section A displays a hypothetical analysis of the Contribution to Objectives (C2O) of an Economic Activity, where the list of potential contributions is aligned with
Article 2(17) SFDR yet is non-exhaustive. Sections B-F are explained in the notes to the following pages.
Hypothetical Product
Examples (and Product
Objectives)
Climate Product (bond focus)
(Objectives for Energy, GHG emission and Renewable Energy)
SDG Product (bond focus)
(All 2(17) objectives apply)
Social Impact Product (equity focus)
(Objectives for Tackling inequality, fostering social cohesion and/or integration, and investing in
economically and/or socially disadvantaged communities)
Company
(hypothetical examples)
Company A Company B Company
C
Company D Company
E
Company A Company F Company G
Economic Activity
(hypothetical examples)
Activity
0001
Activity
0002
Activity
0003
Activity
0001
Activity
0004
Activity
0001
Activity
0003
Activity
0004
Activity
0005
Activity
0001
Activity
0002
Activity
0003
Activity
0006
Activity
0007
Activity 0005
Section B: DNSH criteria of Economic Activities or Companies
GHG emissions no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant harm
Carbon Footprint no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant harm
GHG intensity no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant harm
Fossil Fuel Exposure no harm no harm no significant
harm
no harm significant
harm
no harm no significant
harm
significant
harm
no harm no harm no harm no significant
harm
no harm no significant
harm
no harm
Non-Renewable Energy
Production
no harm no harm no significant
harm
no harm significant
harm
no harm no significant
harm
significant
harm
no harm no harm no harm no significant
harm
no harm no significant
harm
no harm
Non-Renewable Energy
Consumption
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no harm no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no harm
Exposure to high impact
climate sectors
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no harm no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no harm
Impact on biodiversity
sensitive areas
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no harm no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
significant
harm
no harm
Emissions to Water no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant harm
Hazardous Waste Ratio no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant harm
OECD violations no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no harm no harm no harm no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no harm no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no harm
UNGC violations no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no harm no harm no harm no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no harm no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no harm
Unadjusted Gender Pay
Gap
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no harm no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no harm no harm no significant harm
Board Diversity no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no harm no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no harm no harm no significant harm
Exposure to controversial
weapons
no harm no harm no harm no harm no harm no harm no significant
harm
no significant
harm
no harm no harm no harm no harm no harm no harm no harm
DNSH Test outcome pass pass pass pass fail pass pass fail pass pass pass pass pass fail pass
Page 2 of 3 | Notes: This Table displays Hypothetical Product Examples with illustrative, hypothetical objectives and investment strategies. The three hypothetical products are Climate Product, SDG Product and Social Impact Product and their respective
objectives are stated in the subsequent brackets. Companies and Activities are likewise hypothetical cases. Section B features DNSH criteria of Economic Activities or Company, where the hypothetical assessments are limited to no harm, no significant harm, and
significant harm. Section A is explained in the notes on the previous page and Sections C-F are explained in the notes on the final page.
Hypothetical Product
Examples (and Product
Objectives)
Climate Product (bond focus)
(Objectives for Energy, GHG emission and Renewable Energy)
SDG Product (bond focus)
(All 2(17) objectives apply)
Social Impact Product (equity focus)
(Objectives for Tackling inequality, fostering social cohesion and/or integration, and investing in
economically and/or socially disadvantaged communities)
Company
(hypothetical examples)
Company A Company B Company
C
Company D Company
E
Company A Company F Company G
Economic Activity
(hypothetical examples)
Activity
0001
Activity
0002
Activity
0003
Activity
0001
Activity
0004
Activity
0001
Activity
0003
Activity
0004
Activity
0005
Activity
0001
Activity
0002
Activity
0003
Activity
0006
Activity
0007
Activity 0005
Section C: Good Governance of Companies
Governance Structures Very Good Very Good Very Good Good Good Very Good Good Good Very Bad Very Good Very Good Very Good Good Good Good
Management Structures Very Good Very Good Very Good Very Good Very Good Very Good Good Good Good Very Good Very Good Very Good Good Good Good
Employee Relations Very Good Very Good Very Good Very Good Very Good Very Good Good Good Very Good Very Good Very Good Very Good Very Good Very Good Good
Employee Remuneration Good Good Good Very Good Very Good Good Very Good Very Good Very Good Good Good Good Good Good Good
Tax Compliance Good Good Good Very Good Very Good Bad Good Good Very Bad Good Good Good Good Good Very Good
Good Governance Test pass pass pass pass pass fail pass pass fail pass pass pass pass pass pass
Section D: Financial Information (illustrative numbers; as a % of company)
Capex 70 20 10 95 5 100 60 40 100 70 20 10 15 85 100
Turnover 50 20 30 70 30 100 50 50 100 50 20 30 5 95 100
Summary of Test outcomes
C2O Test pass pass fail pass fail pass pass pass pass pass pass pass pass pass pass
DNSH Test pass pass pass pass fail pass pass fail pass pass pass pass pass fail pass
Good Governance Test pass pass pass pass pass fail pass pass fail pass pass pass pass pass pass
Resulting Sustainable Investment (SI) % at Security (S) Level
SI % (S = Company) 100 0 0 0 0 100 0 100
SI % (S = Activity) 100 100 0 0* 0 0 100 0 100 100 100 100 0* 0 100
Section E: Product Weights (illustrative numbers; it is assumed in these examples that activity weight is based on the company weight multiplied by the turnover generated by each activity)
Company Weight in
Product:
33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 50% 50% 40% 40% 20%
Activity Weight in Product: 16.7% 6.7% 10.0% 23.3% 10.0% 33.3% 25% 25% 50% 20% 8% 12% 2% 38% 20%
Section F: Ring-fencing of Activity from the rest of the company (thereby allowing a SI% for an activity where the company is a fail)
Ring-fenced?
Answer
No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No No No
Resulting SI % at Product Level
Company Method 33.3% [=33.3%*100 + 2*33.3%*0] 0% [=2*25%*0 + 50%*0] 60% [=40%*100 + 40%*0 + 20%*100]
Activity Method: 23.4% [=16.7%*100 +6.7% *100 + 10.0%*0 + 23.7%*0+ 10.0%*0 + 33.3%*0] 75% [=*25%*100 + 25%*0 + 50%*100] 60% [=20%*100 + 8%*100 +12%*100 + 2%*0 + 38%*0 + 20%*100]
Page 3 of 3 | Notes: This Table displays Hypothetical Product Examples with illustrative, hypothetical objectives and investment strategies. The three hypothetical products are named Climate Product, SDG Product and Social Impact Product and their respective
objectives are stated in the subsequent brackets. Companies and Activities are likewise hypothetical cases. Section C features the assessment of Good Governance characteristics of the Companies, where the criteria are aligned with 2(17) yet non-exhaustive.
Section D, E and F provide illustrative, hypothetical financial information, product weights and ring-fencing to contextualise the examples. The symbol * highlights that the investment is not a sustainable investment because it is not ring-fenced. Sections A and B
are explained on the notes in the previous pages.
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated
weekly from official ESA sources.