It should be clarified in Annex I of the Delegated Regulation, where the name of the group should be included and whether it should be shown in bold.
- Regulation
- PRIIPs
- Answered
- 2022-11-14
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Answer
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
[Question deleted] (Revised 21 December 2022) 8. The paragraph which comes directly after the heading “Table 1” (“The person advising on or selling you this product …”) is duplicate in view to Elemen
Answered 2022-11-14
Is it possible to show the complete name of the PRIIP when first mentioned in the KID and then simply refer to it as “the product” or “the Fund” thereafter?
Answered 2022-11-14
Does “as appropriate” in Point 7 of Annex III mean that the wording of the elements A-J can be amended? Or should the manufacturer remove an entire text element if it is not suitable for a specific PR
Answered 2017-08-18
The new wording in Article 2(2a)(b) of the ‘What is this product?’ section appears to duplicate the requirement already included in the RTS Article 6 (in the “How long should I hold it and can I take
Answered 2024-03-15
If the recommended holding period (RHP) of the PRIIP is less than one year, how should performance and cost figures be presented in the KID? Point 45 of Annex IV and point 76a of Annex VI of the Deleg
Answered 2017-07-04
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.