In life annuities, should the sum of rents paid up to the period be considered in the minimum scenario?
- Regulation
- PRIIPs
- Answered
- 2023-12-05
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Answer
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
Point 35 of the Annex IV on Performance Scenarios states that ‘the values to be shown for the intermediate periods for the unfavourable, moderate and favourable scenarios shall be calculated in accord
Answered 2025-05-05
Point 52(h) of Annex VI indicates that transaction costs are included in the ‘other ongoing costs’. What does this mean in terms of where transaction costs should be included in table 2 ‘Composition o
Answered 2022-11-14
The main difference between Category 2 and Category 3 is, in accordance with Annex II Part 1 Point 5, whether the condition of "constant multiple" is fulfilled. In the event where a UCITs product has:
Answered 2025-12-05
Packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs)
Answered 2025-12-02
Could you clarify for which intermediate holding periods should we show performance scenarios during the lifetime of a product? (E.g.: 1.1 years product, with remaining lifetime of 9 months). We belie
Answered 2022-11-14
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.