Can a fund with multiple share classes use the price history of an existing share class when a new share class is created rather than use the price history of a benchmark?
- Regulation
- PRIIPs
- Answered
- 2022-11-14
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Answer
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
Is the provision in Annex II, Part 1, Point 14 (b) applicable where a fund has sufficient history?
Answered 2017-07-04
When sufficient history for the SRI calculation is not available to cover 5 years of data for a daily share class, can the PRIIP manufacturer decide to use a benchmark/proxy to cover up to 5 years of
Answered 2024-03-15
How should the requirement to use data of an appropriate benchmark/proxy be interpreted where there is no, or insufficient, price data for the PRIIP or the underlying value. For example: - Would an op
Answered 2017-07-04
Should individual KIDs be prepared for each class of units or shares within a UCITS or AIF?
Answered 2022-11-14
In assessing whether the use of a particular benchmark or proxy is appropriate, potential assets in which the PRIIP invests, consistent with the investment policy, must be taken into account (point 16
Answered 2025-12-05
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.