For Category 2 PRIIPs, is it possible to use lower percentiles of the estimated distribution of outcomes as foreseen in point 24 of the Delegated Regulation?
- Regulation
- PRIIPs
- Answered
- 2022-11-14
- Answer provided by
- ESAs (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA)
Joint Committee Q&As are published in consolidated PDF documents without explicit question/answer delimiters. Section boundaries below are identified automatically and may occasionally be imprecise.
Question
Answer
This Q&A is published by ESA Joint Committee (EBA, ESMA, EIOPA) and is non-binding. It does not constitute legal advice. Updated weekly from official ESA sources.
Similar Q&As
What approach should be taken for Category 2 PRIIPs for which there is not an appropriate benchmark or proxy with sufficient historical data which meets the criteria set out in point 5 of Annex IV of
Answered 2022-11-14
Point 15 of Annex IV of the Delegated Regulation states that for Category 2 PRIIPs for which there is not an appropriate benchmark with sufficient history, performance scenarios shall be calculated in
Answered 2022-11-14
In Annex IV, Case 3 for PRIIPs referred to in point 1 of Annex VIII without sufficient historical data and with no benchmark, or with a benchmark without sufficient historical data, or any other Categ
Answered 2023-12-05
Packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs)
Answered 2025-12-02
The main difference between Category 2 and Category 3 is, in accordance with Annex II Part 1 Point 5, whether the condition of "constant multiple" is fulfilled. In the event where a UCITs product has:
Answered 2025-12-05
📋 Track EU financial regulation continuously
Forseti monitors EU financial regulation and delivers personalised alerts anchored to verified official sources.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.